Article That I Believe May Be Connected To Cam Chatter Yesterday *Theory*

[Jackofalltrades]

Why bold random letters? J/k

[teeray]

Why bold random letters? J/k

:ihih:

[rodeo]

As full season starters, Manning's highest was 64.2 during his sophmore year. Tom Brady's was 62.8. Drew Brees' was 63.4.

yeah. and before people bring up checkdowns: Gabbert threw more checkdowns and had a lower %.

[Mr. Scot]

As full season starters, Manning's highest was 64.2 during his sophmore year. Tom Brady's was 62.8. Drew Brees' was 63.4.

Colt Brennan's was 70.2 for his college career.

[Stumpy]

^win

[teeray]

Colt Brennan's was 70.2 for his college career.

Meh.. I get this argument I guess. I just wish that people would use examples from people who don't play in the WAC.

[Jackofalltrades]

Meh.. I get this argument I guess. I just wish that people would use examples from people who don't play in the WAC.

I wish people wouldn't take run option QB's as a serious consideration for the first pick.

[teeray]

I wish people wouldn't take run option QB's as a serious consideration for the first pick.

If you weren't a moderator....... :incazzato:

[Stumpy]

Meh.. I get this argument I guess. I just wish that people would use examples from people who don't play in the WAC.

Jimmy Clausen

2009

68.0% 28 TD's 4 INT's

Graham Harrell

2006

66.9% 38 TD's 11 INT's

2007

71.8% 48 TD's 14 INT's

2008

70.6% 45 TD's 9 INT's

Chase Daniels

2007

68.2% 33 TD's 11 INT's

2008

72.9% 39 TD's 18 INT's

[rico6]

I wish people wouldn't take run option QB's as a serious consideration for the first pick.

Sounds like a personal problem then.

[Mr. Scot]

Jimmy Clausen

2009

68.0% 28 TD's 4 INT's

Graham Harrell

2006

66.9% 38 TD's 11 INT's

2007

71.8% 48 TD's 14 INT's

2008

70.6% 45 TD's 9 INT's

Chase Daniels

2007

68.2% 33 TD's 11 INT's

2008

72.9% 39 TD's 18 INT's

Ouch.

[Catalyst]

You don't think there's a reason neither of those guys were ever considered day one prospects? Newton is rated so highly for more reasons than his statistical output.

[Stumpy]

You don't think there's a reason neither of those guys were ever considered day one prospects? Newton is rated so highly for more reasons than his statistical output.

If you had read the thread, you would have seen that I was responding to people bringing up Scam's stats as a reason to draft him. That was the point, that college stats mean poo. Especially one season's worth.

What matters is being able to read defenses (he can't) having good footwork (he doesn't) being able to make all the throws (no dice) and having a good head on your shoulders (sorry :()

[CatMan72]

I think it's reasonable to assume the Panthers would really like to draft a franchise QB with that # 1 overall pick. I don't think they're much concerned with whether or not the fanbase would accept drafting Cam with the # 1 overall pick.