Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther top 6 all time busts...


brandon_87

Recommended Posts

haha - Shelton was given all the opportunity in the world to succeed here. I remember a week after they finally cut him, Fox said at a press conference that you can just talk to certain players and its obvious they will never make it in the NFL, no matter how big and strong they are.

So far Fox has been right.

Shelton was drafted in the second round (54th overall) of the 2005 NFL Draft by the Carolina Panthers with a pick they obtained from the Seattle Seahawks. Shelton's NFL career got off to a rough start as he was placed on injured reserve at the beginning of the 2005 NFL season due to a broken foot. In the 2006 season, Shelton rushed for 23 yards on only eight carries, and was activated in only eight games. After a disappointing career with the Panthers he was released by them on September 1, 2007.

So he came in and immediately got injured. That's always bad, but he only got 8 touches in two years with us.

http://www.nfl.com/players/ericshelton/profile?id=SHE413058

I remember him having good Preseason games. I think there's something more to what happened to Shelton than playbook problems. Probably more like Foxy-no-likely-him problems.

Alas, we'll probably never really know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't have made a difference if we hadn't traded that 1st rounder for Brown because I can just about guarantee we'd have used it to draft Clausen anyway and if that were the case we would never be considering taking a QB 1st overall this year, or likely for at least 3 more years.

That trade may have actually done a lot more good than harm, all things considered, even if Brown hasn't become the player we expected. Also consider that we got Mike Goodson as part of that trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he came in and immediately got injured. That's always bad, but he only got 8 touches in two years with us.

http://www.nfl.com/players/ericshelton/profile?id=SHE413058

I remember him having good Preseason games. I think there's something more to what happened to Shelton than playbook problems. Probably more like Foxy-no-likely-him problems.

Alas, we'll probably never really know.

If it was just a matter of Fox not liking him, he would have done well elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruce Nelson belongs on this list.

In a few years, Armanti Edwards will as well.

And Biakabatuka can't really be considered a bust because he was productive when not injured. The hate on Timmy B has never been justified.

bruce nelson and kerry colbert are much bigger busts compared to everett brown. This is a bs list

Not sure I agree about Bruce Nelson. Technically he could be considered a bust, but it was more bad luck than bad pick. Who knew he would have a degenerative hip disease?

Colbert gave us a pretty good rookie year, but didn't coexist with Smitty nearly as well as he did Moose. And one good season is more than Shelton or Jarrett ever gave us.

You have to include Peters, Carruth, and Anderson on the list. Timmy B gives you a strong argument as well. And first rounders should get more emphasis as well. So my top six would be those four, Jarrett, and Shelton.

FWIW, Brown improved last year, and will probably continue to get better. Give him a stud DT to play next to, and I bet he gets better still. This guy really didn't do his homework before making his list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd add Jerry Richardson's idea to go cheap and young in 2010 to the list. With Fox as a head coach and expecting him to play a bunch of rookies because there's no one else on the roster all the while knowing you're gearing up for a lockout.

Have to definitely add that to the "Bust" list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd add Jerry Richardson's idea to go cheap and young in 2010 to the list. With Fox as a head coach and expecting him to play a bunch of rookies because there's no one else on the roster all the while knowing you're gearing up for a lockout.

Have to definitely add that to the "Bust" list.

we just added a 30 something year old shockey..was the youth movement a smoke screen???:mad::mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The OL has certainly been better than the trainwreck it was three or four years ago. As far as competitiveness let's apply some realism and clarity here. Quite a bit of the competitiveness in 2025 came from the defensive side of the ball which gave up the most points in league history the year before and was one of the bottom 5 units in terms of salary cap allocation for 2025 while the OL was top 3. We had the 26th passing offense last year. And if not for a herculean couple of games from Rico Dowdle we don't back our way into the division title or make the playoffs because we went 4-6 in our final ten games including being swept by the Saints who were starting a rookie 2nd round pick most of us mercilessly mocked when they selected him. In conclusion yes we've seen a difference. The question now is will the investment pay off the way we want. But the only way that happens is if we field a top 15 offense. If we can't even crack the top 20 then there need to be some very warm seats across the board. And I would hope just about anyone here should agree with that.
    • These Spurs are lowkey loaded.  If healthy, they could win it all this year (#2 in the West right now). I still think we’ve gotta keep Kalk on Wemby; he’s not getting completely dominated like every other NBA center.
    • Am I the only one who doesn't understand this fan bases infatuation with adding a high end TE? Especially when we have some bigger bodies in T-Mac and Coker who can slide into the slot at times and provide the big dependable target over the middle that most teams use their TE for. I mean, sure, it would be nice to have one of those elite TE's, but I feel like that's a position your better off going cheap with a committee who each bring something different to the table while spending our cap room on the more important positions. I like the potential we saw from Evans this year, Sanders could be a best if he can stay healthy, and Tremble has improved as well.  Just feels like spending high draft picks or cap space on other needs and more important positions is a better use of our resources than splashing on a TE in the draft or FA. Are those guys on the level of the Bowers or McBride's of the world?  Of course not, but we also are paying a fraction of the cost on our TE room than they are, and we're able to use that money for other needs.
×
×
  • Create New...