Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Successful QBs in the NFL with Limitations but the "IT" factor


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Trying to think positive. List the QBs in the NFL who really weren't that good but they had IT.

I thought of three to start:

Joe Namath, Jets 1969 or so : Most people think of him as an great QB, but a careful look at his numbers tells you otherwise. Compared to Cam, I see a lot of similarities, starting with the state they played college ball in.

Jim McMahon, 1985: Very limited QB with a great defense behind him, but at the time, I thought he was great. He was not great. Just a gritty leader.

Jake Delhomme Without his passion for the game, fire, and leadership, he was not a very good QB, was he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to think positive. List the QBs in the NFL who really weren't that good but they had IT.

I thought of three to start:

Joe Namath, Jets 1969 or so : Most people think of him as an great QB, but a careful look at his numbers tells you otherwise. Compared to Cam, I see a lot of similarities, starting with the state they played college ball in.

Jim McMahon, 1985: Very limited QB with a great defense behind him, but at the time, I thought he was great. He was not great. Just a gritty leader.

Jake Delhomme Without his passion for the game, fire, and leadership, he was not a very good QB, was he?

John Elway

Jake Plummer

Terry Bradshaw

Matt Hasselback

Fran Tarkenton

Vinny Testaverde

Randall Cunninham

Mark Rypian

Len Dawson

and the list goes on.

Problem with the whole premise is that Newton is raw but more athletic than everyone on that list with the exception of Randall Cunningham. He has it and his potential is very high. Many of these guys had limited physical skills. That doesn't describe Newton at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, this thread is to give hope to the "haters" (wrong word-correct name should be "conservative thinking realists") as a consolation in the event the franchise takes the biggest risk in team history.

Frankly, I think Hurney will stand in there and not let a rookie defensive-minded coach tell him to take a risky QB. When he is offered several picks, we drop a few spots and the crisis will be wisely avoided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Elway

Jake Plummer

Terry Bradshaw

Matt Hasselback

Fran Tarkenton

Vinny Testaverde

Randall Cunninham

Mark Rypian

Len Dawson

and the list goes on.

Problem with the whole premise is that Newton is raw but more athletic than everyone on that list with the exception of Randall Cunningham. He has it and his potential is very high. Many of these guys had limited physical skills. That doesn't describe Newton at all.

Part of the point. Since when have 40 times and broad jumps meant anything? Since they started televising the combine.

Washington had a bunch of them, since you mention Rypien. Schraeder, Williams, Jurgenson (do not remember him, but heard he was fat), Kilmer, Theisman. they all seemed to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom Brady, a 6th round draft pick who was 8th on the Depth Chart at Michigan, rail thin without a fantastic arm coming in to the league, who through sheer work, grit and bitterness became the best NFL QB in the 00es, perhaps ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...