Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OMGOMGOMG Jordan Gross said he wants us to pick...


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

:nonod:

Might let it slide though because a ninja pirate sounds awesome!!!!

I'm pretty sure O-Line prefer to protect someone that hangs around in the pocket since it's less stress on them...wasn't a bash on Gross(intentionally), but most linemen aren't known for the ability to move around on the field and would rather hang around one area knowing where the QB is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Immediately after the play pictured above, Brandon Meriweather was reported to be extremely angry on the sidelines.

So perturbed was he in fact, that one AFC teammate quoted him as saying "I'm so mad I could shoot somebody!"

...

I see wut u did der! Haha. But seriously I lol'ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird cause if you'd ask Smith he'd probably say a QB

Weird cause if you'd ask Lafell he'd probably say a QB

Weird cause if you'd ask Williams he'd probably say a QB

Weird cause if you'd ask JC himself he'd say a QB

If bullshit didn't exist, neither would you. Weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the fact that you don't see a consensus among the players is another indication that there is ??'s about all of the top picks in this year's draft. There just is not "that guy" in this draft.

Gross's point is probably that he does not believe either Newton or Gabbert is anywhere near ready to start in the NFL. With the other needs we have, do you take a QB at the #1 pick (with no #2 pick) that is likely to take a couple of years to be ready to see the field.

That is why a #1 MUST be ready to play immediately. Whether he does or not is open for debate. But, you DON'T use a #1 pick on a player that is not "NFL Ready" right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the fact that you don't see a consensus among the players is another indication that there is ??'s about all of the top picks in this year's draft. There just is not "that guy" in this draft.

Gross's point is probably that he does not believe either Newton or Gabbert is anywhere near ready to start in the NFL. With the other needs we have, do you take a QB at the #1 pick (with no #2 pick) that is likely to take a couple of years to be ready to see the field.

That is why a #1 MUST be ready to play immediately. Whether he does or not is open for debate. But, you DON'T use a #1 pick on a player that is not "NFL Ready" right now.

At some positions yes but not at Qb. The old pro ready comment is really a very new phenomenon brought on by huge salaries. With a rookie cap this is no longer the case so we can return to when qbs were groomed.

Plus Clausen was considered the most pro ready Qb in the draft. We saw how that worked out.

Qbs are the most frequently taken position as the number 1 pick for a reason. Franchise guys almost never come available in FA or a trade, and the cost is prohibitive. You have to draft a Qb for the most part or take a chance on a guy who has question marks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the fact that you don't see a consensus among the players is another indication that there is ??'s about all of the top picks in this year's draft. There just is not "that guy" in this draft.

Gross's point is probably that he does not believe either Newton or Gabbert is anywhere near ready to start in the NFL. With the other needs we have, do you take a QB at the #1 pick (with no #2 pick) that is likely to take a couple of years to be ready to see the field.

That is why a #1 MUST be ready to play immediately. Whether he does or not is open for debate. But, you DON'T use a #1 pick on a player that is not "NFL Ready" right now.

To be honest with you, I don't normally expect a consensus between players and/or coaches because they each tend to view the team needs from their own standpoint. Plus from time to time you have a guy with an old college teammate who's draft eligible (like LaFell with Peterson).

So in that regard, I don't really see this year as unusual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...