Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Mallet Scenario


Stroupe-a-loop

Recommended Posts

It seems like a lot of the talk on the board has shifted, a bit, to the discussion of Cam Newton. I think it's obvious that the front office wants another quarterback on the roster, and the two consensus picks have been discussed to death. However, I think there is a chance that the team will trade down, look to pick up a second and get a Green/Fairley/Quinn, and then package the second and other picks to move back up and grab Ryan Mallet.

I think this scenario makes sense on a number of levels. This draft doesn't have a clear cut top pick, but it doesn't have a number of blue chip guys with massive upside and who may make an impact right away, and we desperately need another option at quarterback. This move gives us the best of both worlds (kinda) at a minimum cost. I'm not high on Mallet, but he might be the best fit for the vertical offense with his ability to push it downfield.

I think the obvious and most likely scenario is to stay put and take somebody at one. There may just not be a trade available to us. However, I think Hurney fancies himself a wheeler and dealer, and if this scenario made itself available, I think he would probably pull the trigger on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is any truth at all to cocaine use then Mallet has zero chance to be a Panther. Personally that makes me happy, I would rather have Newton behind center then Mallet anyway. Mallet is going to be a huge HUGE bust. He absolutely folds when pressure gets close to him, think a slower, bigger version of Pickles in the pocket. Mallet just has the huge arm that people are enamored by....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way we would draft Mallet. I could see us trading fown and getting a Dalton before we would take a chance on Mallett. Frankly I don't know why we are bringing him in for a workout. Cllausen makes a better face of the franchise than Mallett would, and that is saying something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still haven't seen anything remotely resembling evidence that he has ever used cocaine or any sort of illegal drug. As to the character issues, he doesn't seem any more cocky than a Tom Brady or a Drew Brees. And I don't mean the "I've accomplished something so I can be cocky" I mean the kind of cocky that was ingrained in their personalities before they ever accomplished anything. I would be quite ok with picking up Dareus or Green and then Mallett near the top of the 2nd. If there are legitimate questions about his character, they won't draft him anyway. If they do draft him, I'd trust he's about as squeaky clean as a prospect could be. Rivera, Hurney and Richardson won't draft him if there's even a small chance of the cocaine rumors being true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know now likely it is that this scenario plays out, but I wouldn't mind at all if it did. Actually, depending on what we gave up for the pick we got Mallett with, I'd prefer it.

I don't get the hate for Mallett. He's 10 times the QB that Gabbert is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
    • Nah it was Graham. I remember watching it live.
    • 2002 would have been Kasay. 
×
×
  • Create New...