Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shake up at the top of the draft?


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

I personally think that we will pick Cam, and while I am not happy about it, I will support him and the team.

The problem this year, is there really is no clear cut no. 1 overall pick, to me. Now if Hurney thinks that Cam or PP is the clear cut no. 1 then so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cliff notes; Im admitting that I have no idea who the Panthers are taking.

The draft is Thurs...I would suspect they know who they are drafting pending a CBA isn't reached and they get some mindblowing offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This actually sounds like to me that they like a quarterback that would be available possibly late first or early second. That way, they can trade down a few spots, take a guy of value, then turn around and grab the QB they want later. I don't think they want Newton even if they do stay at 1, but they DO want someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little pet peeve of mine...reading the comments why does everyone assume that were gonna get the first draft pick next year? Were not gonna be good but the last team to get back to back first picks were the Browns and that was over 10 years ago. Im in the Dareus camp but when people say that we can get Luck with the first pick next year I want to punch something cute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to think we don't take him either. It just doesn't feel like a pick Hurney would make, and I think it's too much of a risk at that spot.

And as much as I hate Clausen, I'm beginning to change my mind a bit on Cam. I wouldn't be upset if we took him, but I personally think it may be too risky for the #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...