Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

chris harris


gotsmart?

Recommended Posts

well, in an effort to break up the monotony of the peppers speculation, I thought I would ask a question. Is it me, or did chris harris seem to lose steam after the first few games? I know he is a great hard hitter and a good safety for us, but I was wondering if anyone knew the drop after the first few games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what happens when you make great plays in the first few games, people start thinking you aren't doing your job when you are still playing pretty well.

He was probably second best in the secondary behind Gamble this past year, which is saying a lot.

Not many teams threw down the middle deep, they threw down the sidelines, primarily Lucas and Godfrey's side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what happens when you make great plays in the first few games, people start thinking you aren't doing your job when you are still playing pretty well.

He was probably second best in the secondary behind Gamble this past year, which is saying a lot.

Not many teams threw down the middle deep, they threw down the sidelines, primarily Lucas and Godfrey's side.

dont misunderstand, as I said earlier I know he was a great safety for us this season, but last season and the first 3 or so games this past year he was a beast power hitter and caused a lot of fumbles. I was just wondering why seemingly that level of intensity dropped off.

one theory I thought of was that he might have had to make up for problems in the rest of the D. spreading himself thinner so he couldnt focus in one direction like before... but thats just a useless theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he was consistent throughout the season.. when the team started getting exposed, he still looked solid.. i think he had to compensate for Godfrey a bit though too..

No doubt the development of Godfrey hurt our team. That was to be expected though. When Godfrey had a good game our D was 50% better then when he had a bad one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you look at almost all Daniels stats, they are as good or better than last year minus perhaps Completion Percentage. I don't think Daniels himself is having very much less individual success than the Redskins are reverting to the mean.  https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46003861/nfl-teams-likely-decline-lose-more-games-2025-season-predictions-vikings-chiefs-commanders-lions-colts#wsh Barnwell wrote about them in the preseason as a team that had an inordinate amount of luck or success in one score games that wasn't very likely to be repeated.
    • We thinking of the same Mike White? He probably won’t even make it off the practice squad.
    • I would heavily push back on the notion of Tomlin and Cowher inheriting "collapsed teams." From 1980 to 1991(prior to Cowher and after their Super Bowl victories) the Steelers experienced just 4 sub .500 seasons. In fact the winning percentage for those years was 0.505. At most that was relatively mediocre, something fairly akin to the pre-Tepper Panthers. From Cowher through Tomlin(1992 to Present) it has been the NFL's best franchise. 22 playoff appearances, 4 Super Bowl Appearances, 2 Titles, 15 times winning the division. In fact they have only experienced 3 sub .500 records in that 34 season span.  That isn't ever a scenario where rebuilding happens. It's constant and consistent retooling so that your franchise floor is always high. It's smart business decisions, exceptional drafting and quality personnel moves that create a situation where that floor STAYS high.  It was precisely BECAUSE we opted to go through a complete teardown and "rebuild" without any of that competence being in the organization at all that led us to where we are currently. A situation that will more than likely continue for well over a decade longer.  Long term successful franchises do not "rebuild." They are in a constant state of competent flux that sustains them through some leaner periods without ripping the foundation completely out that led to that success in the first place. 
×
×
  • Create New...