Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rosters could expand...


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

I like this change more than the defenseless player one, that's for certain. Though, this will obviously effect the cap.
if the roster size grows, the cap will grow along with it. the two ideas are married together.
I hope they do this without extending regular season games..
doubtful this happens unless its just one or two spots added.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if its extended, it will be switching two pre-season games into regular season games. that's it. only thing is that the players will get paid for them being regular season games and will be exposing their bodies to wear and tear in games that matter rather than games that don't matter. fans that go to them will be paying full price to see a regular season game rather than full price for a try out.

i'm just having a hard time seeing a problem with two regular season games replacing two preseason games (unless it's a season like last year for the panthers).

i do, however, have a problem with requiring it and at the same time telling the players that there is going to be less money available for salaries. work more, but earn less? you can't expect anyone to be happy about that except owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if its extended, it will be switching two pre-season games into regular season games. that's it. only thing is that the players will get paid for them being regular season games and will be exposing their bodies to wear and tear in games that matter rather than games that don't matter. fans that go to them will be paying full price to see a regular season game rather than full price for a try out.

i'm just having a hard time seeing a problem with two regular season games replacing two preseason games (unless it's a season like last year for the panthers).

i do, however, have a problem with requiring it and at the same time telling the players that there is going to be less money available for salaries. work more, but earn less? you can't expect anyone to be happy about that except owners.

I can't accept that 2 preseason games equal 2 regular season games..

and it's not just that simple.. I don't see the 1st stringers sitting out most of the 2 preseason games because now you only have 2: the team needs to gel.

so now you are playing closer to 20 full games (think minutes, not just games) than 16 full and 4 blah..

I just don't accept it's that cut and dry, and won't wear down our team more by playing more overall minutes throughout a season, when our team already has (typically) had an uphill battle when it comes to injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if its extended, it will be switching two pre-season games into regular season games. that's it. only thing is that the players will get paid for them being regular season games and will be exposing their bodies to wear and tear in games that matter rather than games that don't matter. fans that go to them will be paying full price to see a regular season game rather than full price for a try out.

i'm just having a hard time seeing a problem with two regular season games replacing two preseason games (unless it's a season like last year for the panthers).

i do, however, have a problem with requiring it and at the same time telling the players that there is going to be less money available for salaries. work more, but earn less? you can't expect anyone to be happy about that except owners.

Owners would rather play the Pre-season games. If we have more regular season games its cause of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Owners would rather play the Pre-season games. If we have more regular season games its cause of the players.

based on what?

the owners want more revenue, the players don't want to grind their bodies down..

never have I heard the opposite.... really curious where you can source that information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...