Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schwartz: More than 50 players showed up for workouts


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

That matches what Moose was saying on his radio show today. That is the most I have heard for any team. Great news in my opinion. Bunch of guys that are out to prove they are ready to ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is mildly discouraging

why? sounds like those things were just thrown together. this one sounds like it had a lot of planning.

how long did those teams have workouts? this is going to be 8 days over the course of a couple weeks.

how many people showed up for theirs? how many showed up for this one?

sorry....not much to be discouraged about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Rayzor. This one seems more organized and I would imagine more will get done. I would like to see how Cam is in the huddle and if he can call up a play and execute it.

I also agree. Cam has spent a good amount of time learning the new system and executing it. Now he can meet with the rest of the team and apply it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since there are only 52 players on an active NFL roster, I'd say that most (if not all) of the current players actually attended this workout..

A good sign to say the least.

well...there are about 80 on the roster right now and that number will grow a little as they head into training camp.

probably a good few of them (esp. if they know what's good for them) are guys who are on the fringe and didn't make the active roster last year. PS guys and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only problem i can see with this volume of players, is who is running the show? If that isnt established, how organized will this really be?

well, I know I could figure out how to organize these events.. so I'm assuming the leaders of the team can as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...