Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera remains upbeat during lockout


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

FORT BRAGG, N.C. — As Carolina Panthers players organized a week of workouts this week, their new coach was forced to find out secondhand how they went.

"Guys who have been able to go out and see them have been able to tell me some really nice things about our guys," Ron Rivera said Friday. "They say, 'Coach, they're working hard. It's good to see. They have 54 guys out there.'

"That's outstanding."

Rivera would like to add a veteran defensive linemen, linebacker and defensive back. He thinks the offensive line will be OK — as long as right tackle Jeff Otah comes back from his knee injury. He's happy with the running backs and tight ends.

But there are big questions at quarterback. Rivera said Matt Moore, who began last season as the starter, could possibly be re-signed. Rivera wants to sign a veteran to work with Newton and Jimmy Clausen.

And Rivera acknowledged they must "resolve the wide receiver position."

That means figuring out what to do with four-time Pro Bowl pick Steve Smith, whom Rivera acknowledged has expressed misgivings about returning. But Rivera said trading or releasing him is "not a foregone conclusion."

"One thing I did tell Steve is that we'll make a decision that we feel is best for the team," Rivera said. "and at the same time keeping him in serious consideration for what he would like."

Read more

Fug this lockout!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. He actually answered a question directly about player movement? Damn I'm happy to have a new coach.

I really see Malcolm Floyd & Coefield as our 2 big signings once this mother flippin' lockout ends

If Moore is gone, I'm thinking we push for either Hasselback, Pennington, or Volek (who I don't really care for anymore)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like is that he will make the best decision for the team with consideration for Smith but ultimately it is about the team. That can mean that they may not trade him if they can't pick up someone of equal worth, they won't trade him if the other receivers on the team don't continue to progress, or that they are willing to trade him but it may not be to the team he desires who presumably would not be willing to give up much for him. Versus a less desirable team who is more willing to give us good value.

Personally I hope they tell him they are going to build the offense around him and for him to man up and be a team guy. If you want to be a leader then be one. Otherwise they will trade him but to the team that makes the most sense for the Panthers, not Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my goodness, we didn't hear "the whole coaching staff will sit down when the moments right and evaluate the tape then make a decision." "We will go with the players that give us the best chance to win." Man I don't miss Fox!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wonder what he's got in mind at LB. i know he's probably looking at OLB, but ILM he could be looking for someone with experience in a 3-4. i know beason could probably figure it out, same with connor, but those two would still be newbs. in fact all of them would be in a 3-4. even though we will still be running a 4-3 base, i expect we'll be seeing a lot of 3-4 plus a good few other looks.

plus, no guarantee that we'll be keeping james anderson and thomas davis. we should keep them, imo, but we need to be stronger on depth and be prepared for another setback with TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wonder what he's got in mind at LB. i know he's probably looking at OLB, but ILM he could be looking for someone with experience in a 3-4. i know beason could probably figure it out, same with connor, but those two would still be newbs. in fact all of them would be in a 3-4. even though we will still be running a 4-3 base, i expect we'll be seeing a lot of 3-4 plus a good few other looks.

plus, no guarantee that we'll be keeping james anderson and thomas davis. we should keep them, imo, but we need to be stronger on depth and be prepared for another setback with TD.

That's probably why Rivera drafted Lawrence Wilson.........meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there isn't really much in the way of FAs from the chargers right now as far as OLBs go, but there are a couple good ILBs in kevin burnett and stephen cooper.

i actually don't know if there is anyone significantly better at OLB in FA than TD and anderson. maybe rocky mcintosh at WLB and pisa tinamosa for SLB. not sure about either of those guys in a 4-3, though. rocky didn't exactly handle the transition to 3-4 well. maybe manny lawson and antwan barnes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...