Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

when is it to soon to bang your buddy's x-girl friend?


GritsRgreat

Recommended Posts

You don't have many friends do you?

Hhaha nice personal attack. How do I respond, by saying I literally have too many friends? Then I get called a loser/liar for "bragging" on the internet. Believe me I have a very very active social life. What I said was half a joke, but whats wrong with banging and friends ex. Too me and my friends everything that isn't attached is fair game basically. Odds are they weren't going to get married anyway and if she wants it then go ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has to be a long time, and you have to have been given permission by your friend. Finding out a good friend is banging your ex without your knowledge is like a kick in the nuts and deserves a punch in the face.

fair, but seeing as the majority of most young 20's/college relationships dont last over a couple months then it isn't a big deal. And yes it is fair retribution to give a free punch. Happens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't forget the young TEs, Coker, Etienne, and Jimmy Horn Jr! 😮 I'm amped to see how the team develops over the course of this upcoming season.
    • She must be doing tricks on that thang for Bill 
    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
×
×
  • Create New...