Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Analysis of Newton's first game from Marshall Faulk and Warren Sapp on NFL Network (featured on Panthers.com)

Newton impressive but can still improve

Interesting on a couple of points.

First off, I didn't know Marshall Faulk was a big Newton doubter. He talks in this clip like he was, but now believed Newton can play in the NFL.

Of more interest to me though, are the comments of Warren Sapp, for this reason.

Warren Sapp had a profound effect on the career of Donovan McNabb not with a tackle or a sack, but with words. Prior to a playoff game between the Bucs and Eagles, Sapp called McNabb "a runningback who throws". McNabb didn't like the designation, but he let it get into his head. He wanted to be seen as a passer, not a runner. And he went into the Bucs game determined to show that he could win with his arm, not just his legs.

Before that game, McNabb was never shy about taking off and running. This time though, you could see him passing up clear opportunities to run and instead trying to pass. Announcers noticed and commented on it and how it hindered the Eagles offense, and they ended up losing. The Bucs went on to the Super Bowl.

The effects of Sapp's words went beyond that game though. Sapp was a master of mind games as a player, and this was arguably his most brilliant moment. For years after the words had been said, people could see McNabb passing up opportunities to run, apparently still trying to prove he was a passer, not a runner. And analysts argued more than once about whether that mindset cost the Eagles games.

Having long since retired, Sapp has no reason to play mind games with anyone anymore.

So what does he have to say to Newton?

Watch the clip and see for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna disagree here.

In week one, I didn't think I saw any times where Newton passed up running opportunities. I did see him being a patient passer, which is good and will hold him in good stead if he keeps it up. Granted, that's a fairly subjective thing, but for me it wasn't there.

Truth be told, there is a fine line between being "pass first" and missing opportunities where running would actually be the smart thing to do.

Coaches generally don't like to have their quarterbacks run much because quarterbacks who run are quarterbacks who get hurt. That said, I'm not sure Rivera and Chudzinski are afraid of that. They don't seem like the type to be averse to risk. That can be a good thing, but it can also come back to bite you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now Cam is operating with a pared down playbook which is being added to each week. Not necessarily because he can't handle it but they have had 6 weeks to install the whole offense. I suspect that they are added specific plays for every opponent and then some situationally for where they are on the field. So I would expect to see more redzone plays and options over the next few weeks as well as more planned rollouts and bootlegs.

THis offense is a work in progress and will be for the next several months. So there is a lot of room for improvement across the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with Sapp.

also, I can't recall any players outside of the goaline stand....that Carolina actually designed a play where Newton was pretty much designed to run. All have runs have been after all his option were exhausted or he just felt running made the most sense ( the option not to throw to Smitty in the preseaosn).

I think Carolina could do a better job designing his legs to present a bigger problem for defenses. Still seems like Carolina wants thim to be a pocket passer.....need a little more running from Cam (whether it be his choice or clear intent from coaches and not just being the result of desperation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...