Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A tale of three receivers - LaFell, Gettis, Greg Jennings


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

We keep hearing on the radio "Steve Smith still has it, but we've not found that #2 guy in our WR corp."

There's a thread in here right now that says "Who wants to see Armanti Edwards lining up @ #2 WR?"

After listening to Steve Smith's conference call earlier, he mentioned that he would like to play as long as Donald Driver for the Packers has and be as capable as he still is. This made me rethink the WR perspective a little. With a capable QB starting for us now, we may have all the WR help we need. How so?

If you watch every minute of the video in this thread, you might notice something:

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/68044-inside-the-numbers-24-37-422-yds-2-td-1-int-video.html

(Credit to Tarheels23)

Brandon LaFell actually made a few bigtime catches, and the misses weren't catchable (in fact, I think he only missed one).

So I got looking at Green Bay's star receiver Greg Jennings. He's had an awesome career going into his 5th season having been to the Pro Bowl and helping get his team to the Super Bowl and win it.

And lo and behold... his first year numbers are strikingly similar to Gettis and LaFell's

Jennings:

2006 / 11 starts / 45 Receptions / 632 yards / Avg. 14 yds / 3 TDs.

Gettis:

2010 / 13 starts / 37 Receptions / 508 yards / Avg. 13.7 yds / 3 TDs.

LaFell:

2010 / 2 starts / 38 Receptions / 468 yards / Avg. 12 yds / 1 TD.

All three of these receivers had a commonality in the fact they were playing behind a veteran WR their first year. Donald Driver had 1295 yards and 8 TDs in 2006, while Steve Smith was the #1 starter most of the year last year for us.

But what they don't have in common... Brett Favre had an Ok year in 2006 and was way better than Clausen was last year.

When Aaron Rodgers took over for the Packers, Greg Jenning's numbers started to explode. Once Gettis is back, with a year under his belt, and two under LaFell's with Newton throwing to these cats... I think our passing game has the potential to be one of the most potent in the NFL. And we don't need to go crazy picking up or releasing receivers either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with your potent passing game. I think Gettis has potential to be great. I think Lafell has potential to be a very solid WR..maybe not a deep threat but a good solid reciever. Not saying Armanti is a Steve Smith cause there will NEVER be another Smith, but he can be our quick guy, etc.

Damn I wish Gettis hadn't gotten injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what I got out of this post:

when lafell breaks his leg and still runs 90 yards for a touchdown, then we'll finally have a #2 receiver opposite steve smith.

on a serious note, I think losing gettis was a big blow, but this offense utilizes the tight end in such a way it minimized the need for a "true #2."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

related, here's a big article on Jennings' approach to the game

http://www.jsonline.mobi/more/sports/packers/129300743.htm

Jennings scrutinizes schemes, cornerbacks and safeties. There are no surprise-free games on offense with the clever NFL defenses of today, but Jennings does his best to minimize the unexpected.

Part of his motivation is self-preservation. From his perspective, the next wide receiver that gets cold-cocked in the secondary is the next example of a wide receiver who didn't do his homework.

"By studying, it eliminates a lot of blowup hits," said Jennings. "(Fear) really doesn't come into play too much. If you're in the slot and you're going across the middle, it takes time for you to get that out of your mind. That's when you really, really want to increase your study so you kind of have a feel for where defenders are going to be.

"When I do my part, in that way Aaron (Rodgers) and I are on the same page. I'm not going to run into that blowup shot and you better not throw me into that blowup shot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History is full of average WR's turned into great WR's by elite QB's.....probably just as many great wide receivers have slowly turned into average players by crappy QB's. This is a huge part of why football is a team sport.

We've suffered through some really tough years at QB around here. It's gong to be very interesting to see how all this youth develops with Cam. It's already like night and day with Steve Smith. His enthusiasm has gone through the roof and it's gong to be contagious. What a difference from the disgruntled, trade me picture painted by the media before the draft and the overall gloom of last year's season......remarkable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice if one or two of these guys would step up and become legitimate threats, that way we can concentrate on other needs come April, like CB, OL and whatever else pops up this year.

We've got 15 games to let LaFell play out. I'm watching with interest.

I think Gettis was ready. Had he not gotten injured, I think we would have been seeing something crazy breaking out this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...