Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A tale of three receivers - LaFell, Gettis, Greg Jennings


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

We keep hearing on the radio "Steve Smith still has it, but we've not found that #2 guy in our WR corp."

There's a thread in here right now that says "Who wants to see Armanti Edwards lining up @ #2 WR?"

After listening to Steve Smith's conference call earlier, he mentioned that he would like to play as long as Donald Driver for the Packers has and be as capable as he still is. This made me rethink the WR perspective a little. With a capable QB starting for us now, we may have all the WR help we need. How so?

If you watch every minute of the video in this thread, you might notice something:

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/68044-inside-the-numbers-24-37-422-yds-2-td-1-int-video.html

(Credit to Tarheels23)

Brandon LaFell actually made a few bigtime catches, and the misses weren't catchable (in fact, I think he only missed one).

So I got looking at Green Bay's star receiver Greg Jennings. He's had an awesome career going into his 5th season having been to the Pro Bowl and helping get his team to the Super Bowl and win it.

And lo and behold... his first year numbers are strikingly similar to Gettis and LaFell's

Jennings:

2006 / 11 starts / 45 Receptions / 632 yards / Avg. 14 yds / 3 TDs.

Gettis:

2010 / 13 starts / 37 Receptions / 508 yards / Avg. 13.7 yds / 3 TDs.

LaFell:

2010 / 2 starts / 38 Receptions / 468 yards / Avg. 12 yds / 1 TD.

All three of these receivers had a commonality in the fact they were playing behind a veteran WR their first year. Donald Driver had 1295 yards and 8 TDs in 2006, while Steve Smith was the #1 starter most of the year last year for us.

But what they don't have in common... Brett Favre had an Ok year in 2006 and was way better than Clausen was last year.

When Aaron Rodgers took over for the Packers, Greg Jenning's numbers started to explode. Once Gettis is back, with a year under his belt, and two under LaFell's with Newton throwing to these cats... I think our passing game has the potential to be one of the most potent in the NFL. And we don't need to go crazy picking up or releasing receivers either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with your potent passing game. I think Gettis has potential to be great. I think Lafell has potential to be a very solid WR..maybe not a deep threat but a good solid reciever. Not saying Armanti is a Steve Smith cause there will NEVER be another Smith, but he can be our quick guy, etc.

Damn I wish Gettis hadn't gotten injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what I got out of this post:

when lafell breaks his leg and still runs 90 yards for a touchdown, then we'll finally have a #2 receiver opposite steve smith.

on a serious note, I think losing gettis was a big blow, but this offense utilizes the tight end in such a way it minimized the need for a "true #2."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

related, here's a big article on Jennings' approach to the game

http://www.jsonline.mobi/more/sports/packers/129300743.htm

Jennings scrutinizes schemes, cornerbacks and safeties. There are no surprise-free games on offense with the clever NFL defenses of today, but Jennings does his best to minimize the unexpected.

Part of his motivation is self-preservation. From his perspective, the next wide receiver that gets cold-cocked in the secondary is the next example of a wide receiver who didn't do his homework.

"By studying, it eliminates a lot of blowup hits," said Jennings. "(Fear) really doesn't come into play too much. If you're in the slot and you're going across the middle, it takes time for you to get that out of your mind. That's when you really, really want to increase your study so you kind of have a feel for where defenders are going to be.

"When I do my part, in that way Aaron (Rodgers) and I are on the same page. I'm not going to run into that blowup shot and you better not throw me into that blowup shot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History is full of average WR's turned into great WR's by elite QB's.....probably just as many great wide receivers have slowly turned into average players by crappy QB's. This is a huge part of why football is a team sport.

We've suffered through some really tough years at QB around here. It's gong to be very interesting to see how all this youth develops with Cam. It's already like night and day with Steve Smith. His enthusiasm has gone through the roof and it's gong to be contagious. What a difference from the disgruntled, trade me picture painted by the media before the draft and the overall gloom of last year's season......remarkable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice if one or two of these guys would step up and become legitimate threats, that way we can concentrate on other needs come April, like CB, OL and whatever else pops up this year.

We've got 15 games to let LaFell play out. I'm watching with interest.

I think Gettis was ready. Had he not gotten injured, I think we would have been seeing something crazy breaking out this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dalton is ancient by NFL standards. Howell is only 25.  Howell's only year as a starter he put up almost 4k yards, 21/21 with a 43.2 QBR while being sacked 65 times.  This past year and the 3rd starting, which many would consider to be Bryce's best, he barely put up 3k yards 23/11 with a QBR of 47.6 while being sacked 27 times.  Pickett 4 years in the league, with 27 starts, he's amassed 4900 yards, 16/16 with a 53.6 QBR.  Now if Bryce were injured for a season, which QB would you say has more potential to step in and run an offense? I'd say Howell only because in a single season he threw for 1k yards less, more tds and granted more ints in 11 less games as a starter than Pickett's whole career.  Everyone is saying Pickett sucks, Howell sucks, but what I'm seeing is Bryce is right on par with them. Howell is on his 5th team, so is KP, yet Bryce just got a 5th year extension putting up pretty much similar numbers. The bar for QB on this organization is really low.  Did I want Howell? I didn't care. I wanted someone, anyone, who can potentially be better than what we've had the past 3 years or who we signed as a backup. We do not have even a mid tier NFL QB on the roster right now.  If Howell was brought in as camp fodder and didn't make the cut, wouldn't hurt my feelings at all. If we bring in another QB via the draft, I hope it's someone who could have the potential to be a starting QB with some development because that's the whole point.  We can't be afraid to bring in anyone who might have the potential to unseat Bryce or take his job if he's injured. The goal is to get winning seasons and make SB runs with hopefully a victory or 2. Pickett doesn't accomplish that. Dalton hasn't been able to even be in consideration for that role in over 2 years. 
    • Next 2, Brooklyn and Philly are must wins that we should have no problems winning. Other 2 are Knicks and Celtics in Charlotte, split those. I think that 5 of 6 is very doable. And probably will be necessary for our pursuit of a 6-8 seed. Hawks keep rolling sadly but at least Miami and Orlando finally slipping up after they both had long winning streaks like Atlanta. 76ers obviously in a free fall
×
×
  • Create New...