Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bank of America Stadium = Poorly built for rain?


Varking

Recommended Posts

I am not sure how many people here actually went to the game but for those who sat in the front row with me can vouche, this stadium sucked on Sunday. It got to the point in the first half where you literally could not sit in your sit because water was flooded so high, if you put the seat down to sit, it was over you. Where the railing was, the water was that high and flooding over the side onto the field. Is it like this at other stadiums?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure any stadium is built to handle that much rain in that short amount of time. Flash floods can happen anywhere including stadiums.

I was laughing at the folks in the first row who chose to stay where they were (up to their knees in water) instead of moving up 1 or 2 rows... a few of them were clearly enjoying the attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure any stadium is built to handle that much rain in that short amount of time. Flash floods can happen anywhere including stadiums.

I was laughing at the folks in the first row who chose to stay where they were (up to their knees in water) instead of moving up 1 or 2 rows... a few of them were clearly enjoying the attention.

I was on the 50 in the front if you were talking about me. It was cool, we got game worn wide receiver gloves thrown to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like BOA from an attractiveness standpoint, but dang it doesn't drain well.

The fact that the field was still splashing to the end of the game indicates to me that the field drainage system is very, very inadequate. In 2009, Auburn had a home game against WVU that had a deluge just prior to the game and actually delayed the game for about an hour. Much like BOA yesterday, the water was pouring down from the stands and creating pools on the field.

By the time they started the game though, no splashing. The field had totally drained. I was really surprised that BOA's drainage seemed to be overwhelmed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...