Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bridesmaids

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

Search isn't working for me, so I can't get to the original thread I made. But this movie was hilarious. Wasn't expecting it, but it was funnier than Hangover 2 for me. Kristen Wiig has always been my favorite current SNL member, and I was unfamiliar with Melissa McCarthy, maybe I should watch that Mike and Molly show.

And the jewelry store scene was my favorite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stumpy Grand Master

Stumpy

Posted
Posted

I couldn't disagree more. McCarthy was absolutely hilarious, but the rest of the cast was unwatchable.

It's one thing to not be able to deliver a line on a live sketch show. But if you can't get your line out, without laughing, in a major motion picture, that ruins it for me.

Also, yes, you should definitely watch Mike & Molly. It is one of the funnier shows on TV right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Cannon Newbie

The_Cannon

Posted
Posted

She was pretty funny on SNL she had a real no holds bared approach. I saw one episode of Mike and Molly and it was horrendous. I did see Bridesmades and I was excited about it because of the reviews and what everyone told me but I just thought it was meh. funny parts but defiantly not the next great comedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...