Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Niners and Jags joining Lions in logo and uni's change.


pstall

Recommended Posts

It's not completely going retro, the link says that's what that fan wants. The owner likes the Old Cherry red color and they are updating the logo....Not yet final if the new uni will completely be 1980's or like the 1994 uni...First look will be at the draft in a couple of weeks....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a good idea for the 9ers

Just to qualify this. I was a 49er fan before the Panthers.

I hope they do go back to the color of the unis from the 80's. I hated the new red, it was darker almost crimson. I think the gold is darker too. Hated it! But that was the beginning of the end for them for me.

GO Panthers!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changing uni's seems to do lots for any given team, lift the teams spirit kinda. Look at Denver a few years back, kept falling short, then they upgrade their colors and BAM! Elway got his ring. Arizona, perfect example, never did squat, change uni's slightly, and BAM! they beat our beloved team. Patriots, Seahawks, and the Giants all found success soon after upgrading. But, yea, why would Jax want a change? Entirely too new to need something different.

Personally, I think we have the best looking uni's in the game, and will be upset if there's talk of changing them. Unless it'll bring Lombardi to Carolina...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tell ya, I wish the Jets would go back to their old logo. It was a lot cooler looking in the 80s and 90s with the, you know, actual jet on the helmet.

As for San Fran? I honestly had to look up what their uniform looks like now... I had no idea they even changed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
    • Sign him up. I am willing to bet he wouldn't finish a game with -2 yards.
    • He is just fuging limited in every way.  On one hand, and nfl player, you would want to bulk them up so long as it doesn’t limit their mobility, elasticity, flexibility, ROM, or dynamicism - as is the concern with bulking up.  But the issue with that is, you would be worried about that when a guy has those traits to begin with.  Bryce is a very average athlete with a weak arm.  So if you’re not gonna be a great athlete with a strong arm, bulk up.  And if you can’t or won’t bulk up, find another fuging profession that doesn’t require athleticism and arm strength.  You’re built like a bitch AND aren’t a great athlete - you can’t be subpar in both categories…  well, unless you play for the Panthers apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...