Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Toronto School Bans Hard Balls


Jangler

Recommended Posts

Lesson 1: How you know when you/your kid is a complete pussy.

A Toronto elementary school has banned most balls from its playground, citing the need to protect staff and students after a parent got hit in the head with a soccer ball.

Gotta be kidding me. What's next? Banning paper because someone was hit in the head with a ball of it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lesson 1: How you know when you/your kid is a complete pussy.

Gotta be kidding me. What's next? Banning paper because someone was hit in the head with a ball of it?

Paper cuts are deadly. I also got a tiny paper ball stuck in my ear once while in school because I put it in there and couldn't get it out. My mom had to take me to the doctor. BAN THAT poo NOW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*** Yea!!! My brother and I used to smack each other with 2x4's for fun. These bitches are crying because a PARENT got hit with a soccer ball. Don't wanna get hit? DODGE MUTHERFCKER!!! Speaking of which dodgeball is the greatest game in the world second only to football.

Too bad it is illegal in public schools now. We're raising a generation of pussies. I hate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know where Sandusky is moving with all these kids chanting for balls...

Too soon?

Serious note though, that's pathetic. I was responsible for getting dodgeball banned from my middle school after pelting a kid in the head with the ball, but that's what kids are supposed to do. It builds character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...