Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettis Vs Lafell


panther4life

Recommended Posts

as rookie's LaFell looked to be more complete.

LaFell is coming off a strong 2nd season. I think he has potential to really make progress in year 3 (which is big for WRs).

I think Gettis will be more if a situational WR running his deep route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think LaFell has the better season next year as well. He came around the last few games and although I think Gettis is going to be a stud, LaFell will have the better year next season.

Smith, LaFell, Gettis, ? , ?

We have a good 1-2-3 punch at WR next year. Going to be interesting to see who fills those final 2 spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think LaFell will have an incredible year next year, also.

I think the mix of receivers we have are very good.

Smitty is electric, can do multiple things really well, and is a true leader.

LaFell is strong, bulky, can make routes across the middle, and can block really well.

Gettis is fast, runs a really awesome deep route, and provides someone who can take the top off the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think Gettis is getting lost in all of this because he has taken a year off.

I like both LaFell and Gettis and not going to get caught up in the numbers. Both will have similar numbers IMO.

They are different types of receivers. Lafell is a possession receiver while Gettis is someone you put on the outside for mismatches with his speed and size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see Gettis & Lafell do some "Off-season" workouts with Cam. I know I heard Cam is going to be "working" like normal until the Superbowl. Maybe Cam's LEADERSHIP in this area will bring other guys in, that could use a little extra work for the upcoming Playoff run next year!

Anyone think this is possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...