Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Courtney Upshaw?


Catalyst

Recommended Posts

I've been thinking lately about the possibility of Courtney Upshaw being a bit of a dark horse candidate for our pick. I expect he'll be a top-10 pick after workouts and while most have him as the top 3-4 OLB/edge rusher in the draft, I wonder if we'd be interested in him?

I'm not sure that he can play 4-3 OLB, but he does have the size to play DE and could also play OLB in a 4-3 if the scheme were set up just right. Basically, he'd be a jack of all trades pass-rusher type. Put him at DE in 4-3 looks, OLB in 3-4 looks, make him a hybrid in other looks. Our version of Terrell Suggs.

If we're talking BPA on defense, it may just be Courtney Upshaw. He's perfectly built for a 3-4 OLB so most folks will write him off as our pick, but really, this dude can rush the passer and we desperately need that. He'd allow us to get really creative on defense with how we use him and would also give us a key piece if we ever do actually move full-time to a 3-4 scheme.

Can't find any 2011 clips, but here's 2010:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People forget that we'll be looking for a Sam, where size is size to take on the TE against the run game but he also has to be fast enough and have the coverage skills to stick with that TE in the passing game.

We have some pretty good QB's and TE's in our division and conference and we've got to find a way to cover them.

Not saying Upshaw isn't the guy, it's just something people tend to overlook when elevating OLB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People forget that we'll be looking for a Sam, where size is size to take on the TE against the run game but he also has to be fast enough and have the coverage skills to stick with that TE in the passing game.

We have some pretty good QB's and TE's in our division and conference and we've got to find a way to cover them.

Not saying Upshaw isn't the guy, it's just something people tend to overlook when elevating OLB's.

I'd guess that Upshaw will not be the guy covering the TE if we drafted him. He doesn't have the hops to jump with Jimmy Graham... not many do. We'd have to make our Safety cover the TE. Mark Barron was covering Alshon Jeffrey (who basically a TE).. so I am sure a guy like Markelle Martin has the size to cover TE's successfully. I'd be fine with Upshaw and Martin for our first couple picks. We would fill two major holes.. improve our pass rush, and our secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so anderson is moving to the Will?

People forget that we'll be looking for a Sam, where size is size to take on the TE against the run game but he also has to be fast enough and have the coverage skills to stick with that TE in the passing game.

We have some pretty good QB's and TE's in our division and conference and we've got to find a way to cover them.

Not saying Upshaw isn't the guy, it's just something people tend to overlook when elevating OLB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
    • Jackson actually played quite well for a #2 CB #54 in PFF coverage ratings 12 pass break ups solid in run defense..... Hes gonna be targeted just because Jacyee IS being avoided.
    • Yeah, these arguments are getting twisted to the point that it's just an airing of old grievances for the 100th time. No matter what happened in the past, no matter what the "trajectory" is, Bryce has to show why he was a number 1 overall draft pick.  If people didn't like Cam and what he did for us at QB, I hate to see what poor Bryce is gonna get if he doesn't reach Manning-esque heights. 
×
×
  • Create New...