Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you're Marty what DT do you keep.


koolkatluke

Recommended Posts

Keeping Fua would be a mistake. I think it would come at the expense of Kearse. Who is a much better NT than Fua.

You don't get rid of a third round guy like Fua who is on a rookie contract in his second year unless he is really bad. And there is no reason to believe that we have to get rid of Kearse either. We will take at least 6 DTs into camp and will keep 4 or 5 on the roster. Lets see how they do in cap and during the season before we kick anyone to the curb. Rookie DTs usually make their biggest progress between their first and second years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't understand this whole get rid of guys after one season stuff, all of our dt's have played well at times(some more than others) with edwards expected to be back next season I doubt we look to do much at d tackle but that could change as the months go on. i expect us to look to add playmakers in the lb & secondary units first & try to coach up most of the guys we have on the roster already at d tackle unless we can get somebody that upgrades the postion from day 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't understand this whole get rid of guys after one season stuff, all of our dt's have played well at times(some more than others) with edwards expected to be back next season I doubt we look to do much at d tackle but that could change as the months go on. i expect us to look to add playmakers in the lb & secondary units first & try to coach up most of the guys we have on the roster already at d tackle unless we can get somebody that upgrades the postion from day 1

I predict this is exactly what the Panthers will do. They already spent 2 third round picks last year on DT, and Edwards is coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you need to get a clue. Players need time to develop and teams are'nt getting rid of 3rd round picks after one year. Mcclain and Fua are assured spots, everyone else tights it out including Edwards.

Mcclain

Fua

Shirley

Edwards

Draft pick(probably Still)

I think we go with five guys, if Edwards can't come back swap out with Kearse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...