Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Floyd In


Peppermint9030

Recommended Posts

Catching some grief from the Defensive Tackle with the first crowd yet? I agree Floyd is gonna make some team very happy. I think his value is right where we are picking and don't understand those saying if he slips to the second we will take him. Matter of fact could see someone trade up for him. The 49ers and the Bears are looking for a real deal numero uno WR and the Eagles are looking for DeSean "Sideline Cancer" Jackson's replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after blackmon there is a clump of about 4 or 5 WRs without a lot of seperation. floyd is right in the middle of that clump.

I disagree with ya Rayzor. Imagine that. In my opinion there are only three possible Elite WR's. Blackmon, Wright and Floyd. Sanu, Jones, Randle, and the rest will not be able to come right in and produce like the Top Three. There is a definite gulf between the two groups.

Matter of fact i think its the DT class that has very little separation in talent. With no Suh or Dareus scouts have inflated the value of Brockers and Still. If i may i would like to rank the DT's imo.

1a. Brockers

1b. Still

1c. Brandon Thompson

2a. Jerel Worthy

2b. Fletcher Cox

3a. Dontari Poe

3b. Josh Chapman

See what i did there? Too much comparable talent to reach. Tier 1 are the all around guys with the most upside. Tier 2 are the pass rush and McLain competition. Last but not least Chapman and Poe are insurance if Edwards comes back less that 100% and or Fua does not step up. Then again i feel that drafting two last year, the emergence of Neblett, and the return of Edwards makes this a potential logjam on the depth chart and ultimately a wasted pick.

Just my opinion but Poe, Chapman, and my pick Mike Martin of Michigan could all come in a contribute on our team or any other team just as well as Brockers or Still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Catching some grief from the Defensive Tackle with the first crowd yet? I agree Floyd is gonna make some team very happy. I think his value is right where we are picking and don't understand those saying if he slips to the second we will take him. Matter of fact could see someone trade up for him. The 49ers and the Bears are looking for a real deal numero uno WR and the Eagles are looking for DeSean "Sideline Cancer" Jackson's replacement.

Tarheels fan, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are you talking about DTs?

i thought this was a discussion of Floyd and WRs.

i think this is a very good class of WRs. sorry if you don't agree with me that there isn't much seperation between those WRs. i just don't see it. it's not knocking floyd. i he's one of the best in a very good and deep class.

i think any of floyd, jeffery, wright, sanu and randle can come in right away and do well starting. i don't mess around with ranking these guys because i think they are all massively talented and a lot of it depends on the situation they go to. i could even see all these guys taken in the first round. i expect that there will be at least 4 WRs taken in the first.

WRs are coming out better prepared for the pro level just like QBs are. i wouldn't be a bit surprised to see all those guys and a couple other rookie WRs starting by the season's end.

as far as us drafting a WR in the first...no question i'm not a fan of that idea because i think that fixing the D is the biggest priority. go BPA on D is what i suggest. i just happen to see that brockers can be that elite talent that you look for that early. quite a few people agree with me on that. if blackmon miraculously falls to us somehow then we take him, but that won't happen. same with kalil. same with claiborne.

i'm not singularly focused on DT. i just think that if brockers is as good as advertised then he could make the biggest positive difference out of anyone aside from those few i listed. if we trade back i'm available to more options.

by not taking a WR that early, we might miss out on a very talented prospect later, but the same can be said for lots of positions.

just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...