Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Athleticism trumps weight DL prospects


Catweisers

Recommended Posts

It's worth noting that Hurney has always been a 'game tape' guy rather than a workout guy. This means that whoever we take will likely be someone who had good production/game tape in college. Brockers really doesn't fit that, IMO. He's a physical freak, but he doesn't really stand out on tape like you'd expect a top-10 prospect to and didn't put up stats that make you take notice.

Just throwing that out there... Hurney almost always tends to pick the player who has the best game tape rather than the player who looks the part or is more athletic or whatever the case may be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's worth noting that Hurney has always been a 'game tape' guy rather than a workout guy. This means that whoever we take will likely be someone who had good production/game tape in college. Brockers really doesn't fit that, IMO. He's a physical freak, but he doesn't really stand out on tape like you'd expect a top-10 prospect to and didn't put up stats that make you take notice.

Just throwing that out there... Hurney almost always tends to pick the player who has the best game tape rather than the player who looks the part or is more athletic or whatever the case may be.

If Brockers does well at the bench press and runs a decent 40, I don't think we'll have to worry, he'll be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brockers only did 19 reps during the bench press. In contrast, Memphis DT Dontari Poe did 44... and he's equally athletic, albeit much larger than Brockers.

If we're going to go DT, I'd MUCH rather trade down into the 20's and take Poe. Hell, at this point I honestly wouldn't mind taking him 9th overall. His stock appears to be rising quickly. He reminds me a lot of Haloti Ngata, TBH. Big space-eater who commands double teams, collapses the pocket, and would make Johnson/Hardy/Keiser's jobs a lot easier.

Plus, long-term if McClain develops the tandem of Poe + McClain reminds me a lot of the 'Williams wall' in Minnesota a few years back with one big monster run stuffer and one pass rusher/penetrator.

Plus, Poe was on a terrible Memphis team and had basically zero help and still managed to play his way into the 1st/2nd round, which shows that he can perform even when surrounded by inferior talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His footwork has been discussed at length, just like Cam's was--no argument from me there. What I'm asking for is a statistical indicator that supports the idea that Bryce's footwork is creating meaningful issues. With Cam, we could clearly correlate occasional high passes to footwork problems. With Bryce, there are occasional misfires as well, but we aren't seeing it surface with the frequency of severity you'd expect if it were such a persistent issue. That's why when concerns about his footwork and height are paired together, there should be some measurable statistical impact. That's what I keep coming back to. That same inconsistency shows up in the deep ball critique. Saying "he misses guys outright" suggests he either isn't seeing them or can't hit them downfield... yet, as we've already seen, he was top-10 in catchable passes over 20+ yards. If accuracy were truly the issue, it should reflect in the data. It's also worth pointing out that deep-ball concerns largely became the next talking point after he made it through the season without the durability disaster some were predicting (despite being sacked for what was then the second-most times ever for a rookie QB). As for those sideline throws you mentioned: what specific throws are you referring to? If you can identify them, I'd be happy to pull up the PFF premium grades or grab All-22 clips from NFL Pro to look at those sequences and assess how real that concern is. For my part, I'd actually like to see improvement in the intermediate game. That was a strength his rookie year, but he seemed to trade it for a stronger deep game this past season. Could that shift relate to height and footwork? Maybe! But again... we'd need data or film trends to verify that rather than assume it. On the "top-10" classification front: I know that it's a moving target for most people. That's why I've been asking for specifics. Without a shared definition, it's hard to engage meaningfully. So with you moving away from raw yardage, does that mean your preferred KPIs are now height, weight, red zone efficiency, and point differential? If so, that's totally fine (just being clear about it helps). That said... red zone success and point differential depend heavily on OL play, WR execution, coaching decisions, defense (for point differential), etc. They're influenced by the QB but not exclusively determined by him... which, like passing yards, makes them more difficult to isolate for analysis of Bryce's performance.
    • I think "amazing" is basically relating to his prior performances, which is a very low bar. Even at his peak(so far), he hasn't consistently been an elite performer either by the simple eye test nor statistically. Regardless, we have seen the flashes of WHY we drafted him #1 overall and he is visibility significantly more confident. Hopefully he has spent an inordinate amount of time this offseason getting that footwork better and more consistent. That's going to be a massive factor in his continuing improvement.
×
×
  • Create New...