Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One week in an elevator


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://www.itwire.com/science-news/space/53004-japan-may-build-space-elevator-by-2050

The Obayashi Corporation in Japan says it can use carbon nanotube technology to build a space elevator into space – extending from Earth’s surface to more than 96,000 kilometers (59,520 miles) in altitude. And they hope to do it by 2050. My fingers are crossed in anticipation!

Nanotube technology consists of material that is over twenty times stronger than steel. Nanotubes are based on carbon or other elements.

These nanotube systems consist of graphitic layers seamlessly wrapped into cylinders, only a few nanometers in diameter (with one nanometer being one-billionth of a meter in length).

Company officials at Obayashi gave details of a trip in the Space Elevator, saying up to thirty passengers could be taken at one time for the ride straight up into space.

Passengers would travel at a speed of about 200 kilometers (124 miles) per hour, which means the trip would take over seven days to complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep imagining a basketball spinning around with a coffee straw attached.

Does not seem possible at all.

I get the counter-balance weight thing... that seems really hard to do, but not completely impossible...

If/when we have the right material to build it, how the hell would they connect the cable from the surface to the orbital counter-balance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Even if you concede that Bryce gets better as the season goes on you cant have a QB that just surrenders the first 2 games and the next 4 or 5 are iffy
    • I understand very clearly that Wilks’ approach in ‘22 wasn’t going to make us able to beat the better teams, but he got us competing and succeeding against the teams we should beat, similar teams to us. And it felt the best any stretch has felt, under Tepper.  But Tepper and the mob here had to have themselves the Offensive Minded HC, play caller guru. How’s that working out?    I know this: guys in the locker room were all about Wilks. He equaled or bested the win total of every other coach under Tepper before or since. It is a fact, and not for nothin.    FWIW I didn’t think he was gifted as a DC, when he was here as the DC. But he was excellent coaching DBs. All those jobs are different I guess, take different skill sets. I think his strength as a HC was getting people to follow him. That goes a long way.  After what has befallen this team since rejecting him, I don’t feel like a lesser fan for supporting him, I promise you that. 
    • Since you also posted the Denver game, worth pointing out thumbing do anything for three quarters after the first drive until Denver went into garbage (Bryce) time.  They got a meaningless late touchdown to make it a 14 point and give Bryce some yards.  Since we’re moving into superlatives, they weren’t competitive at all in that game.  and Bryce also got complete outshone by Bo Nix and anyone with pride would retire after that. 
×
×
  • Create New...