Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we pass on DT in rounds 1 and 2 are we destined for failure on defense?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Not necessarily failure. I argue that there is not one dt that will significantly standout above what we have now. By mid season a couple of these guys will probably blossom but they could also have growing pains. Brockers has huge upside (apparently) but he will not be a world beater day one. Jury is still out on Poe and Still but I think Edwards would be a competent alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't u just post a much much longer thread saying the exact damned thing? This is why I refrain from signing in during the offseason, but for you I made an exception!

yes i did, but I specifically wanted to hear from Catsgrowl, P55,FIZ, Raging Bull and Killer Kat and anyone else who staunchly supports DT in the first 2 rounds. They may not go back to that thread. Just want to give them every opportunity to see and answer the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

contestant # 1 has already dodged the question.

ZOmG if I say there isn't a DT we should take then there isn't WUT about DaT do u people not understand?!!11!!!eleven!!!! It doesn't MATTER what those affiliated with the game say U should Listen to me I mean gah iz u dum er what??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would have no problems with that. i just dont see how a LB (4-3 LB)that does not go after the QB gets taken in the top 10 as bpa. no matter what scheme you run on defense it all starts up front with the DL.

he did what was asked him....and was the best LB in football.

he has the skill set where he can do whatever is needed. Upfront in this scheme and pressure means front 7, not front 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well with just that knowledge this is a stupid question. Without knowing who the CB and DE are, how well and quickly they pick up the scheme and adjust to the NFL, whether they start or are situational, whether Beason and Davis come back, etc. there is no way to even have a good guess to answer the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...