Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mario Williams or Vincent Jackson


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Both guys could help us obviously. If it was anyone other than them, I don't think we consider it because both aren't positions of need as our team is currently constructed... But, both are extremely talented and game changers at their position (when on the field).

I know we are really close to the cap and I'm sure some restructures and/or releases are coming, but is there anyway realistically we could structure a deal for either of these guys to get them to come here?

Also, this is assuming that Williams or Jackson give us a slight discount - Jackson for his connection with Rivera and Williams being an NC guy.

I bring this up because Schefter says apparently the Texans can't afford to keep Williams after the deal they gave Arian Foster because the tag would be worth 23 mil. And it's long been anticipated that the Chargers would let Jackson go after this most recent season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can always restructure contracts to change when money hits the cap, it's just a matter of how badly you want to screw yourself over in future years.

as far as jackson vs williams, i'd rather get 3-4 quality mid tier FAs than one big name guy but that's just me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Panthro, those are no doubt the type of signings I expect from us. Bargain bin signings with potential high-reward and low-risk on the investment. I would love us to sign Reggie Smith.

What I think our team needs more than anything else, especially on defense, is competition.

@Kurb, agreed. I'm confident going forward with WR and we've got two guys in LaFell and Gettis with great size/speed, which is similar VJax. But, I thought it was worth bringing up because I know he's been a popular topic of discussion in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can always restructure contracts to change when money hits the cap, it's just a matter of how badly you want to screw yourself over in future years.

as far as jackson vs williams, i'd rather get 3-4 quality mid tier FAs than one big name guy but that's just me

No doubt, the reasons I say no is it would fug us so badly down the road.

Anything is possible, dealing with it later is the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can always restructure contracts to change when money hits the cap, it's just a matter of how badly you want to screw yourself over in future years.

as far as jackson vs williams, i'd rather get 3-4 quality mid tier FAs than one big name guy but that's just me

Agreed. Lotta good talent this year. Give me some of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can always restructure contracts to change when money hits the cap, it's just a matter of how badly you want to screw yourself over in future years.

as far as jackson vs williams, i'd rather get 3-4 quality mid tier FAs than one big name guy but that's just me

Well, that's what I was thinking... If we could get Williams on a deal that is backloaded but light on the cap number the first and second years, possibly incentive laden.

Then again, unless he really just wanted to come home, I'm sure some team out there is ready to give him Peppers money despite his injury history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...