Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Not Jake?

DaveThePanther2008

By DaveThePanther2008,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

I hear everyday how 50% of you hate Jake. Think that he is washed up. Done for. All because of one game. Some of you even contend it was a bad season for Jake. Cause we won a few of thoses games by luck. "if it weren't for S. Smith we would be _-_ (u fill in the blank) instead of 12-4" "Jake got lucky, he flung it up there and by the grace of god Steve caught it"

Whatever your reason is, I don't truly care. Now to my question.

If not Jake who? Gonna trade for Cutler? Bring in another loose cannon like K. Collins? Package a deal together for Brady Quinn? Hell Vince Young or Matt Liehart might be available for the right price. Or maybe we could package our 2010 thru 2012 1st round picks and Peppers for T. Brady. Culpepper might be had. Hell maybe NYG will take Peppers off our hands and we can bring back David Carr. Garcia is ava.....never mind that is stooping too low. Would never take TB garbage anyhow.

Our best options are on the team already. Josh McCown has been on our F.O. radar screen for years. He has been with us a year and now will have the whole preseason to settle into #2. Matt Moore, another highly targeted, player our F.O. had on their minds. IF JAKE FALTERS, things will be OK.

God forbid he doesn't overcome that loss but if he doesn't we have our QB's for the future. Just as good if not better than any of the Talent in this years draft or Free Agent Market.

I don't think Jake has our coaching staff so blinded that regardless of his talent he is our QB. Jake still has the ability to lead us and the F.O. thinks so too. Will he be around to 2014. Don't think so.

For the Fans that still believe in Jake. Let's watch him closely and see what 2009 brings us. For the FANS that think he is god. Those days are gone. Those of you that think he is garbage. Get a grip, he isn't that bad. But if you do... Who do YOU place him with?

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

People are in "sticker shock" over this Delhomme deal - but at the end of the day it was a cap move. Details haven't been released yet, but I'd suspect most of the 45 mil is on the back end of the contract. I don't think the Panthers expect Jake to be the starter for 5 more years, but the length of the contract is so the money can be spread out.

Jake already had a fat contract and was taking up 11 mil in cap this year. The Panthers had to come up with a number that Jake and his agent would agree to, otherwise Jake would just sit on what he's got and then he could have really held this organization ransom next year (with no cap). Moore has shown some good stuff and some bad stuff - but he's still very raw. McCown is here for damage control. In the bigger picture, this was a good move for this franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
Matt Moore is our next starter.
i still agree with this, though i do not mind at all taking advantage of the pool of QBs coming out next year. still....i like the idea of moore being the next in line.
even with the new deal jake has? i rem hurney saying jake has a young arm..to me that means he will be playing here to he is..like 36-37 that would make moore 28-29..thats a lil old for a first time starter.
i would say, yes, even with the deal that jake got. here is the thing. jake wants to retire a starter. does that mean he has to be the starter when he retires? how much would it mean to have a backup QB intimately familiar with the team and the offense with all the experience jake has. jake could still start for the next year...maybe two and then be benched but still remain as our primary backup.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted

People are in "sticker shock" over this Delhomme deal - but at the end of the day it was a cap move. Details haven't been released yet, but I'd suspect most of the 45 mil is on the back end of the contract. I don't think the Panthers expect Jake to be the starter for 5 more years, but the length of the contract is so the money can be spread out.

Jake already had a fat contract and was taking up 11 mil in cap this year. The Panthers had to come up with a number that Jake and his agent would agree to, otherwise Jake would just sit on what he's got and then he could have really held this organization ransom next year (with no cap). Moore has shown some good stuff and some bad stuff - but he's still very raw. McCown is here for damage control. In the bigger picture, this was a good move for this franchise.

IRONY...

Criticizing a cap-strapped team for signing their starting QB to an extension because you don't understand how the salary cap works.

Okay, that's not really ironic - it's just pathetic.

Post in other thread...

Okay, let me try and explain this to you....if 20 mil of the 42.5 is guaranteed, that means it is essentially a signing bonus and does not count towards the cap, so 42.5 - 20 = 22.5 over 5 years as far as the cap is concerned. 22.5/5 = 4.5 million a year vs. 11 million a year. That means we gave Jake a contract he would accept which allowed us to free up 6.5 mil in cap space.

So yes, 20 mil is a cap move.

vader-fail.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...