Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryne Robinson Vs Joe Adams?


Gabeking

Recommended Posts

I'm asking this out of pure curiosity, how were they regarded as returners coming out of college? How are they different exactly? Is adams a better player coming out of college compared to robinson? Im asking simply because i am not quite aware of how robinson was regarded Coming out of college compared to adams and i just hope Adams doesn't become another Robinson cuz I'm really excited about Adams. Thanks to whoever responds!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robinson was a very good return man....but played in a weak conference and most of his claim to fame as a returner was in large part due to playing 4 years. You can climb the record books if you play 4 years.....very few guys play 4 anymore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryne Robinson measurables- 4.47 40, 6.71 3 cone, 4.21 20 yard shuttle, vertical 35, broad jump 123

5'9", 179 lbs. Miami of Ohio- college stats- 258 receptions, 3697 yards, 14.3 ypc, 22 TDs, Punts-121 ret 1677 yards, 13.9 ypr, 7Tds.

Joe Adams measurables- 5'11", 179 lbs, 4.55 40, 3 cone-7.09, 20 yard shuttle- 4.18, vertical- 38, broad jump- 123 "

Arkansas- college stats- 164 receptions, 2410 yards, 14.7 ypc, 17 Tds, Punts- 63, 570 yards, 9.19 ypr, 5 Tds Stats saying he average over 15 yards a return don't include fair catches.

Even accounting for the different competition level, Adams seems more explosive but Ryne was a more consistent receiver. Hopefully Adams doesn't have any serious injuries but being smaller may be an issue. Durability can be a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...