Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Three Poll On Nfl.com


Gallagher

Recommended Posts

Jesus, Houston's is just unfair. If only Schaub and Johnson could consistently remain healthy. If they do, they are a serious contender in the AFC.

I'd probably go, out of that four, Houston, Carolina, Pittsburgh, and Philadelphia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Houston has a very good chance at a deep playoff run if each of those players are healthy. Shcuab is a former Cav, but I gotta give it to him; he's a pretty good QB. However, I'd have to choose us. We don't know exactly what Stewart would be if he had a #1 role like Foster and Smith has had better seasons than Johnson despite a 6" difference.

Also, the true Steve Smith bio comes up if you google his name, nasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Houston has a very good chance at a deep playoff run if each of those players are healthy. Shcuab is a former Cav, but I gotta give it to him; he's a pretty good QB. However, I'd have to choose us. We don't know exactly what Stewart would be if he had a #1 role like Foster and Smith has had better seasons than Johnson despite a 6" difference.

Also, the true Steve Smith bio comes up if you google his name, nasty.

Gotta go back to 2005 for Smitty to top Johnson.....Johnson has put up comparable numbers to that year or been on pace when injured almost every year since then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of those listed I think houston is the best, however they lack depth at QB and WR (Ben Tate is pretty good, then again they have a GREAT Oline). Most unanimously agree that fitz, calvin, andre and smith are the best 4 receivers in the game and their placement is debateable. Foster is the most complete back in the NFL, better than Peterson and McCoy. He's great at every facet of the game. As good as our RBs our, both Dwill and Stu have weaknesses (both could still easily be every down backs), but they play off each other so well it works great.

Honestly it's a pretty silly arrangement considering how reliant certain offenses are on less conventional key personnel. New England is super reliant on tight ends while us and KC run a dual back system. Also, all homerism aside, why arent the falcons listed in this? Turner white and ryan are all very good at their respective positions. (Edit: I'm an illiterate dumbass. They are there. I need to stop coming on here after bar time.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...