Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South Training Camp Battles

CarolinaPanthers8789

Recommended Posts

CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

Atlanta Falcons (Linebacker): Lofa Tatupu vs. Akeem Dent

New Orleans Saints* (Offensive Line): Charles Brown vs. Zach Strief

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Running Back): Doug Martin vs. LeGarrette Blount

Carolina Panthers (Linebacker): Thomas Davis vs. James Anderson

CAROLINA PANTHERS

Linebacker: Thomas Davis versus James Anderson

After using the No. 9 pick on Boston College’s Luke Kuechly, it is pretty safe to say the rookie is going to be a starter in Carolina from the get-go. Like stalwart Jon Beason, Kuechly probably can play any of the three starting linebacker spots in the Panthers’ base 4-3 scheme, but he is at his best in the middle.

To ease the rookie’s transition to the NFL, keeping Kuechly at middle linebacker probably makes the most sense when it is all said and done. He just might be the NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year in the middle. If healthy, Beason will start at one of the outside positions and should wear the communication headset in his helmet as an every-down contributor. He, too, is a great player and very versatile.

The issue is with Anderson, a solid and steady linebacker who rarely gets the national credit he deserves, and Davis, who truly has great qualities but has a brutal injury history. If Davis isn’t Davis, this situation is easy: Anderson will play on the strong side and Beason on the weak side. But if Davis looks like his old self in the preseason, he needs to be on the field, which would in turn put Anderson on the bench for much of the time -- which he certainly does not deserve. It will be interesting as to how it shakes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Cannon Rookie

The_Cannon

Posted
Posted

This is something I've struggled with. I don't think its a question of who will benefit the most from playing the Mike it's who will suffer the most by playing the outside. Beason wasn't BEASON when he had to play outside two years ago so I want him in the middle. But at the same time it will help Luke's transition playing in the middle where he's comfortable. I think it'll fall into place with a good balance between Anderson and Davis in one of the outside slots but the real question will be where will Luke and Beason end up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

I want to say first, that if Davis had Anderson do his knee the first time, it would have been the only time. So I am going with the mind-set that he should be good to go. What actually happens? Who knows?

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

If you have talent, you have to find a way to get it on the field. We have a pooload of talent at LB, going to have to find a way to get them all on the field. And I feel our S are better than our CB except for Gamble. So getting more LB and S on the field only makes sense. At least to me.

I also think that Rivera is wanting all his top LBs to be able to play all the positions. Interchangable parts mean more variables as to looks and schemes. The more versatility you have, the easier it is to disguise what you plan.

Just a thought or two. And GOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

The battles I'll be watching will be at CB, safety, and WR. I feel good about our LB corps. If everyone is healthy, we should have 4 legit NFL starting caliber LBs.

I want to see how the secondary battles will play out and I want to see who will earn the right to see the field at WR. We have a lot of young talent in the WR corps and I want to see who is gonna step up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

I highly doubt Anderson gets bench. At worst he would be splitting time with Davis.

I want to say first, that if Davis had Anderson do his knee the first time, it would have been the only time. So I am going with the mind-set that he should be good to go. What actually happens? Who knows?

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

If you have talent, you have to find a way to get it on the field. We have a pooload of talent at LB, going to have to find a way to get them all on the field. And I feel our S are better than our CB except for Gamble. So getting more LB and S on the field only makes sense. At least to me.

I also think that Rivera is wanting all his top LBs to be able to play all the positions. Interchangable parts mean more variables as to looks and schemes. The more versatility you have, the easier it is to disguise what you plan.

Just a thought or two. And GOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would you think we run a 3-5-3 with 3 safeties then say Gamble is better than our safeties? Why wouldn't you keep Gamble on the field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

If you have talent, you have to find a way to get it on the field. We have a pooload of talent at LB, going to have to find a way to get them all on the field. And I feel our S are better than our CB except for Gamble. So getting more LB and S on the field only makes sense. At least to me.

cookie_monster_what_the_hell_is_this_crap-s321x311-263104.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

Not so sure I'm on board with this. I think we have fine outstanding linebackers but our safeties are at borderline poo. That said I agree there is some room for creativity but I don't think we need to get carried away. I think in most cases if you show Drew Brees a 3-6-2 he will show you 6 points and a touchdown dance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brokenbad Newbie

Brokenbad

Posted
Posted

I'm actually starting to think they'll kick Beason outside and put Luke at Mike. Regardless of TD's health I think you have to protect him by limiting his snaps. On short yardage I'd gladly sub TD for S Martin to have an extra sure tackler, thumper on the field.

Me thinks if Davis is 100 percent, then on occasions Luke should line up in Martins spot and Davis play OLB. Not saying make luke a permanent safety, just on occasions because he would help stop the run and offers good pass coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brokenbad Newbie

Brokenbad

Posted
Posted

I'm actually starting to think they'll kick Beason outside and put Luke at Mike. Regardless of TD's health I think you have to protect him by limiting his snaps. On short yardage I'd gladly sub TD for S Martin to have an extra sure tackler, thumper on the field.

Me thinks if Davis is 100 percent, then on occasions Luke should line up in Martins spot and Davis play OLB. Not saying make luke a permanent safety, just on occasions because he would help stop the run and offers good pass coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • HardcoreHokie
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By HardcoreHokie · Posted

      I definitely respect your opinion more than Tracy McGrady, Vince Carter, and Carmelo Anthony (whom I just watched on their show, all saying NOBODY wants to get the Hornets in the post-season). You win.
    • TD alt
      Canales doesn't sound all the way sold on Bryce

      By TD alt · Posted

      For all the good feelings about Bryce Young, when you read between the lines, it's what DC says and doesn't say that makes us know that Bryce hasn't necessarily been the supercomputer that they thought he would be. This season, Bryce has to make a tangible progression on the field. "A big part of it is being able to operate at the line of scrimmage — not in the huddle — when we want to, and he’s certainly capable of that," Canales said about Young. "It’s not solely on him. It’s a group that’s pretty young. You have to trust all the guys to go up there, communicate verbally or nonverbally and execute what we’re doing. We’ve made huge strides in that regard. His ability to alter things based on what they’re giving you will give us another edge, which he’s continued to grow and had some great examples down the stretch where he identified things they were doing, got us to the right check and capitalized on some plays. Want to see him do that more when it’s appropriate. We don’t need to be changing things just to change it." The implications, perhaps insinuations, are pretty evident. Bryce is just going to have to do better. "And then for Bryce, it’s the identification of early on the cues that the defense are giving us, to be able to eliminate parts of your progression before the ball’s even snapped. That happens with time. I’ve seen quarterbacks really own and master, which allows them to play lightning fast." Obviously Bryce isn't necessarily picking things up as fast as Canales would like, and I can only assume that Canales is making comparisons to Russell Wilson, Geno Smith and Baker Mayfield. But, of course, not everyone picks things up at the same rate. Bryce's pace has left Canales wanting for more. During the coming season, I don't believe that it will be good enough for Bryce to start putting things together in December, evidence of the light switch being on is going to have to show itself in September. Basically, it's really the moment that we've all been waiting for, the one that we thought should've happened earlier, the one that brings Bryce's accountability in the spotlight. On an off note, perhaps to that end, we should consider the possible implications upon the draft, but that's another story. Basically, it's time for Bryce to sh¡t or get off the pot. https://roundtable.io/sports/nfl/panthers/news/carolina-panthers-dave-canales-holds-nothing-back-on-bryce-young-in-new-interview
    • firefox1234
      Tony Pauline’s 2026 NFL Mock Draft 4.0

      By firefox1234 · Posted

      Wouldn’t mind Tyson. Definitely prefer him to Sadiq.
×
×
  • Create New...