Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kealoha Pilares


Jaxel

Recommended Posts

Lol I didn't even say Armanti is a good WR I said he's more versatile and faster than Pilares which are both true. Neither one is an average receiever at this point.

if you wanna give a roster spot to a below average kickoff returner that can literally do nothing else thats your opinion i suppose. its a stupid one, though

Armanti isn't faster he may be quicker but not faster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Armanti isn't faster he may be quicker but not faster

Armanti had a 4.41 pro-day 40 compared to Pilares' 4.42. Edwards low is also a 4.37 compared to Pilares 4.40.

They are pretty much the same in straight line speed, with Edwards having a slight edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lmao no he didnt

from what i remember he had two terrible boneheaded kickoff returns and 1 catch

he doesnt belong on this team and he will get cut eventually anyway. he obviously will never be on the field at receiver in the regular season with how Murphy is playing and he is completely boneheaded on kickoff returns.

You said he was slow and couldn't be a receiver. He caught a pass over the middle and displayed his speed. You sir are a fine young male.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You said he was slow and couldn't be a receiver. He caught a pass over the middle and displayed his speed. You sir are a fine young male.

I didn't say he couldn't be a receiver, I said he isn't a good (not even close to approaching average honestly) receiver and he isn't a good kick off returner and thus should not make the roster. And I'm 100% right. Sorry if that upsets you

Maybe you guys will see the light after a few back of the endzone takeouts to the 15 yard line and DNPs at receiver this season. When Armanti gets cut you will all jump on him next. I'm just a step ahead of you idiots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say he couldn't be a receiver, I said he isn't a good (not even close to approaching average honestly) receiver...

And you are basing this evaluation on what? Have you watched him extensively at camp? Because none of us have seen enough of him in games to make that kind of statement. When they have called his number, he has responded well, and that's all you can ask.

For whatever reason (and I assume it is man love for Armanti) it is clear you don't like Pilares, and that's fine. Just don't expect anyone else to necessarily share that opinion without some visual evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say he couldn't be a receiver, I said he isn't a good (not even close to approaching average honestly) receiver and he isn't a good kick off returner and thus should not make the roster. And I'm 100% right. Sorry if that upsets you

And you're getting this from? Very curious as to where you're getting your opinion from. Is it his two solid preseason performances? The fact that his teamates have spoken nothing but good about him? I'm sure you've studied the tape and came to a conclusion.

No one is saying he's Smitty, or he should be starting. He looks like avery versatile Slot Recevier/4th WR. Get your goddamn head out of your ass.

Maybe you guys will see the light after a few back of the endzone takeouts to the 15 yard line and DNPs at receiver this season. When Armanti gets cut you will all jump on him next. I'm just a step ahead of you idiots.

Since when did you have future sight?

Like where is your proof he'll have takeouts tothe 15 yard line? Or that he won't play? Oh right. You have none.

So jesus christ shut the fug up. It doesn't matter if he preforms well or not he was a 5th round draft pick who is currently preforming well.

All it sounds like right now is a player you don't like is on the team and it hurts your poor wittle feefees and you pretend like what you're stating is fact when it clearly fuging isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in the least.

But I'll bump this thread after the season when Pilares gets less than 100 yards receiving in garbage time (obviously he will playing behind Smitty, Lafell, Murphy, Gettis). I wonder if everyone will still be pretending he's useful. Just let Adams return kicks stop wasting roster spots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...