Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Saints* at Panthers Prediction Thread...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I don't think we are going to be able to outscore the Saints*. Maybe we can keep it close, but even when they looked liked they were gonna get blown out by the Skins, they still scored 32. While I think there will be improvement and the Saints* d is not strong, I don't know if we can hang 40 on them.

We will have to be mistake free to pull it off. I don't see it happening. Close until the end of the third quarter.

Saints* 38

Panther 28

That thurs pm game vs NYG could be a battle of 0-2 teams. Not what the NFLN expected when they thought to air it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game is against the Saints*.

The Saints* hate Divisional Opponents.

Here come all the illegal chops, clips, head shots and eye gouges....

Get ready for IR somebody...

Panthers 17

Saints* 24

If Cam recognizes 8 in the box, it will be a different Story.....

Go Panthers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...