Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Bruce Campbell start Thursday?


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

I think Bells fine, so no I wouldn't shake up the OL. They played great on Sunday, and hopefully they can continue to do the same moving forward. I don't want to see Campbell inactive ever again though Rivera....

Yeah, when I saw Williams come in the game. I said ah hell na.................................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see Campbell active but not starting. We need our guys as fresh as their Dline. They have a disgusting DE rotation.

I'm more worried about their passing attack. Gamble needs to stick to Nicks all game. IDK who's better for Cruz. He's not especially tall so Captain could work with him. My guess is we just leave Norman on the outside and pop Cap on the slot man since they occasionally work Cruz in the slot.

Despite their incredible pass rush we should be able to tear this defense up. After that front 4 the Giants D is incredibly vulnerable, and we have a multitude of tools to get into the second level. I just hope doesn't play as cute as he did vs the Bucs, these long developing plays will get sniffed out by that Dline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...