Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Beas...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Recovers from torn achilles, dealing with some minor knee issues, and hindered by a putrid defensive line that can't stop a preschooler from running to the second level...

MUST LOOK LIKE PRO BOWLER ON EVERY PLAY!

The missed tackles that he has had over the past couple of games was NOT due to the DL. Beason is not his old self yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera said the missed tackles are due to a shoulder injury he was trying to play through.

I'm not sure he has any body parts that aren't injured.

I don't buy that....shoulder injury came out only after the game. Rivera said it was generally soreness from that game later.

Beason has looked sub par since retuned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera said the missed tackles are due to a shoulder injury he was trying to play through.

I'm not sure he has any body parts that aren't injured.

If he is injured bad enough that he can't tackle properly then he should sit and heal. I love Beason but missed tackles hurt the team and I love the team more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...