Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coach Chud Believes the 4th and 1 call was the right one


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

I, in that particular situation at that point, did feel good about giving Cam multiple options there," Chudzinski said, "running and then having a couple of guys that he could throw the ball to, to get out on the edge. And they actually misaligned on it which made it tough for us

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000078827/article/cam-newtons-curious-case-at-the-goal-line?module=HP11_content_stream

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year we did nothing but use Cam on goal-line situations, never used Stew

Now we're not doing either. Yes things like this makes you want to fire Chud on the spot

I agree that we should be utilizing our runners more. In this isolated play, however, it was a good call since it should have worked. Thats the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year we did nothing but use Cam on goal-line situations, never used Stew

Now we're not doing either. Yes things like this makes you want to fire Chud on the spot

Two of the 4 downs from within the 6 yard line were runs and the final one was a rollout where Newton had the option to run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted this in another thread... Rivera said that their thinking was that the D tackles outweighed Kalil and Kalil also had hurt foot, so they didn't think there would be enough push...

I still would have run it with Cam or at least JStew behind Tolbert.

Cam did make a poor play/pass but had they called a run, that would have been moot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
    • Lot of passion there.  Look, if Bryce plays down to the level that we feel the need to draft a QB high, you don’t think the locker room might be ready for anything that helps them win?   There are s lot of angles to this that could come into play depending on what happens this year. 
×
×
  • Create New...