Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best loss of the season...Why?

Panthers Nation

By Panthers Nation,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

BBQ&Beer Newbie

BBQ&Beer

Posted
Posted

Simply quoting the prior post:

"...and padded his stats to make us even more attractive..."

and you wouldn't call that being a stat wh0re?

No. If we were leading by 21 & he was still slinging it down the field, that would be stat whoreish. Adding to his stats because you have a shot to win is doing his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Oh, okay, I get it...

You're justifying why losing is good, but I'm outta line... okay, cool. Gotcha now, I understand.

Morons, keep trying to convince yourselves why you're right, maybe you'll start believing yourselves soon also.

Actually all I was doing was replying to a dumb post suggesting Cam was being a stat ***** when he was trying to win a two possession game....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PrimeTyme Newbie

PrimeTyme

Posted
Posted

Simply quoting the prior post:

"...and padded his stats to make us even more attractive..."

and you wouldn't call that being a stat wh0re?

Cam played well and didnt turn the ball over... this translates into him being a stat *****? some of you guys are crazy

when Cam puts up good numbers he is a stat *****, and when he doesnt he's a unproductive bum...

no loss is a good loss, but I agree with the OP, this was the best loss

Go Panthers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

Actually all I was doing was replying to a dumb post suggesting Cam was being a stat ***** when he was trying to win a two possession game....

Actually, All I was doing was replying to a dumb post suggesting this loss was good because Cam padded his stats and made the organization "attractive" to potential GMs and HCs....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Actually, All I was doing was replying to a dumb post suggesting this loss was good because Cam padded his stats and made the organization "attractive" to potential GMs and HCs....

And yet you called Cam a stat *****.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

Yeah, the loss sucked. No loss is good. I hate losing. But the silver lining is Kuechly played like the monster he is, as did Cam. Makes this job more desirable. That's all I think anybody is trying to say. I wanted this win pretty damn bad, it just didn't happen. Next season is what I'm looking forward to. This season is done. I'm rooting for good production. I want to win, but I'm not getting completely down over losses like I did the first half of the season. Not until next season, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

Yeah, the loss sucked. No loss is good. I hate losing. But the silver lining is Kuechly played like the monster he is, as did Cam. Makes this job more desirable. That's all I think anybody is trying to say. I wanted this win pretty damn bad, it just didn't happen. Next season is what I'm looking forward to. This season is done. I'm rooting for good production. I want to win, but I'm not getting completely down over losses like I did the first half of the season. Not until next season, anyway.

I'm an Auburn fan... I've become quite enured to losing this year. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

And yet you called Cam a stat *****.....

and what do you call someone who "pads his stats..." (quoting from the previous)? Mind you, no mention was made of an effort to win the game. "Padding his stats" was all that was said, so don't try to infer anything that wasn't stated by the poster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ECHornet
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By ECHornet · Posted

      Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • strato
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...