Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any realistic shot at Cordarrelle Patterson?


beastson52

Recommended Posts

So like title says, any realistic chance this guy is still available at 14th now that the Phins signed Wallace? I really really like this guys athleticism (someone that tall should NOT be able to cut and change direction like he does)!

I'm not really up-to-date with the position needs of any of the other team that pick before us. That is why I seek the Huddles plethora of knowledge on this and I'm tired of skimming through all the "sign (insert recently cut player) now"!!

So what do you guys think? plausable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo is gonna take a Qb, Tennessee just used a first rounder on a receiver last year, no way the Jets take another raw receiver in the top 10 and they already have Hill and QB issues. Im thinkin he will be there now unless somebody trades up ahead of us. Even still im not sure we would take him either, wouldnt mind it tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not going to Miami bc they already have Wallace and Hartline.

But prob no. He may be heading to the Jets, Buffalo or Tennessee.

I think we're going DT at 14, leaving us to take a receiver in the 2nd (Hunter, Woods, Patton, "Roger", Twill, Hopkins). I'm happy with that

I just don't see us going DT in the first. That position has the second highest bust rate in all of football. Take a corner or receiver if its there if not take oline. All of these options play the numbers better than a DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Glass houses and all. I find the people who are the most adamant about this type of thing tend to have the most to hide. Careful buddy. 
    • Also, wanted to point out, all 3 of the Pivot guys I respect and appreciate tremendously.  I know RC only had 1 pro bowl, but I loved his game.  He was tough as nails and played with a ton of heart and grit.  He was trying to knock people out, but was also super cerebral.  Fred is obviously a hall of famer and just as tough. Channing made the most of what he had and was hard-nosed as well.  And yet, all three of them let Steve slide on a ton of poo in this interview.  They actually cowered in several moments and I don’t like that at all.  Because for all the things I mentioned in my initial post in this thread, them not trying to reel him back in or hold his feet to the fire on certain bullshit, and feels gross.  Yall were all on the same competitive level as athletes, and yet, yall just let him skate on poo like talking about invoking using a gun on someone, laughing off how he essentially ended two teammates’ careers by BULLYING them and then co-signing it, and letting him completely sidestep accountability about his affair.  I get it, because apparently he invited you to his home to do the interview, but either talk some real poo or don’t do the interview at all.  This was some real softball poo.
    • This season’s leader, Daniel Jones, is averaging 265.9 yards per game, that would rank 12th in 2015. Even going back to 2020, he would rank 10th in passing yards. So it does appear that passing yards is down, but is that because they aren’t as good? Possibly, but we were spoilt in recent years when we had Brady, Peyton, Brees, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, Rivers, Ryan, Stafford (etc). As crops of QBs go, it was an amazing era to watch and most will end up in the Hall of Fame. I’m not convinced you we could list as many potential Hall of Fame QBs from the current crop. Will it go pass heavy again? I think there’s a good chance that it will, but it will require QBs that can consistently air the ball out in the frequency we saw in the 00s and 10s. I think currently coaches are favouring a more balanced approach, if not favouring a strong running game. 
×
×
  • Create New...