Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistically who will be there at pick 44?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

I keep seeing guys mocked and see us bringing in people but quite frankly how may will be there at 44.? Will J hunter,Larry Warford ,D Hopkins,Eric Reid, Barrett Jones. David Amerson, Matt Elam. ,Robert Woods,Johnathan jenkins be there? Anyone else? Who is the BPA out of all of them?

We need to hit on the 44th pick but who will it be? Am i correct in saying we have had meetings with Elam and Hunter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is really hard to say.

Players will slide out of the first round, which will change the entire dynamic of the.second round.

and that is why i love the draft some teams will reach causing shifts in teams drafting arrangements which then results in frantic trading and swapping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends on who we draft in the 1st as to whom we may draft in the 2nd

Of course it does but i was hoping i could see who may be there and who could be an upgrade to our current roster because I believe we are counting on our 2nd pick to be a starter. Example I see an OG,NTand safety that would add immediate starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep seeing guys mocked and see us bringing in people but quite frankly how may will be there at 44.? Will J hunter,Larry Warford ,D Hopkins,Eric Reid, Barrett Jones. David Amerson, Matt Elam. ,Robert Woods,Johnathan jenkins be there? Anyone else? Who is the BPA out of all of them?

We need to hit on the 44th pick but who will it be? Am i correct in saying we have had meetings with Elam and Hunter?

A lot of those could quite realistically be available at #44. I'm thinking Hunter, Hopkins and Warford are the most likely of that group to be gone. They also happen to be the 3 I'm most interested in at #44, assuming we go DT at #14.

I'm not sure about Elam, but I'm pretty sure we were just present at Hunter's pro day, checking him and Patterson out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of those could quite realistically be available at #44. I'm thinking Hunter, Hopkins and Warford are the most likely of that group to be gone. They also happen to be the 3 I'm most interested in at #44, assuming we go DT at #14.

I'm not sure about Elam, but I'm pretty sure we were just present at Hunter's pro day, checking him and Patterson out.

Yea I think at least Hopkins will be gone....I am pretty sure we spoke to Elam. I am not sure how interested we will be in the second wave of receivers unless we want to supplant Lefell for some reason.I am inclined to think we would be looking at either a OG,OT,SS,NT,or CB with the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...