Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistically who will be there at pick 44?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

I keep seeing guys mocked and see us bringing in people but quite frankly how may will be there at 44.? Will J hunter,Larry Warford ,D Hopkins,Eric Reid, Barrett Jones. David Amerson, Matt Elam. ,Robert Woods,Johnathan jenkins be there? Anyone else? Who is the BPA out of all of them?

We need to hit on the 44th pick but who will it be? Am i correct in saying we have had meetings with Elam and Hunter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is really hard to say.

Players will slide out of the first round, which will change the entire dynamic of the.second round.

and that is why i love the draft some teams will reach causing shifts in teams drafting arrangements which then results in frantic trading and swapping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends on who we draft in the 1st as to whom we may draft in the 2nd

Of course it does but i was hoping i could see who may be there and who could be an upgrade to our current roster because I believe we are counting on our 2nd pick to be a starter. Example I see an OG,NTand safety that would add immediate starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep seeing guys mocked and see us bringing in people but quite frankly how may will be there at 44.? Will J hunter,Larry Warford ,D Hopkins,Eric Reid, Barrett Jones. David Amerson, Matt Elam. ,Robert Woods,Johnathan jenkins be there? Anyone else? Who is the BPA out of all of them?

We need to hit on the 44th pick but who will it be? Am i correct in saying we have had meetings with Elam and Hunter?

A lot of those could quite realistically be available at #44. I'm thinking Hunter, Hopkins and Warford are the most likely of that group to be gone. They also happen to be the 3 I'm most interested in at #44, assuming we go DT at #14.

I'm not sure about Elam, but I'm pretty sure we were just present at Hunter's pro day, checking him and Patterson out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of those could quite realistically be available at #44. I'm thinking Hunter, Hopkins and Warford are the most likely of that group to be gone. They also happen to be the 3 I'm most interested in at #44, assuming we go DT at #14.

I'm not sure about Elam, but I'm pretty sure we were just present at Hunter's pro day, checking him and Patterson out.

Yea I think at least Hopkins will be gone....I am pretty sure we spoke to Elam. I am not sure how interested we will be in the second wave of receivers unless we want to supplant Lefell for some reason.I am inclined to think we would be looking at either a OG,OT,SS,NT,or CB with the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't disagree, but you're not giving our offense enough credit, and I'm not saying we would win the SB, just that we would be contenders, which we would have been. The Bengals had a horrible start to the season last year and it caused them to just miss the playoffs by one game, but had they made it, they absolutely would have been contenders in the AFC.  They had a bad defense, probably worse than ours will be this year, and you can't convince me that we don't have a better offensive roster than they had last year.   We have a Top 10 OL, two 1k rushers from last year, two 1st round WRs, one of the best slot WRs in the league, and then Coker.  Like I said, their Top 2 WRs are better than ours will be this year, but we take them in every other spot, OL, RBx2, and our 3rd/4th WRs.   If Burrow was able to turn that team into a contender last year, no reason he couldn't do the same with our roster this year.  And hell, I think our offensive roster is better than KC's last year too, and while I know their defense did a lot of the heavy lifting last year, if you give Mahomes an improved offensive roster around him, he's going to be THAT much better himself. A Mahomes, Burrow, or Allen would be able to win the South by outscoring teams.  And yes, come playoff time against an Eagles or Lions juggernaut, our defense probably costs us the game, but that doesn't mean we wouldn't at least be contenders. If Bryce can prove me wrong and his supporters here right, and be THAT guy for us this year, I genuinely think we can be a real playoff threat in 2026 once we add a few more pieces to the defense and then be a genuine SB contender in 2027 if the team keeps improving. We're the 2022 Detroit Lions right now.   Great offensive pieces, tons of holes on defense, but if things go right we'll just miss the playoffs (like they did) and then be right in the playoff hunt the next year (like they did) and then be contenders the following season (like they did when they were the #1 seed).
    • Hornets have had the worst luck of any professional sports franchise this century. Constantly drafting a slot below the generational talent, all because of the lottery done behind closed doors. It's been brutal and frankly unfair to be a diehard fan of this franchise, and I don't blame anyone for cutting out the stress.
    • We will see if there is any logic to those sort of packages. I haven't seen a ton of evidence that Evero operates that way.
×
×
  • Create New...