Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Winston wants 3-4 million..


Recommended Posts

I am not advocating for or against Winston, but as to our ability to give a FA 3 or 4 million a year, yes, we could do that. You give him some signing bonus, spread it over 3 years, with a minimum salary the first year of the deal. That way, the cap hit is less than the 3 or 4 million, but he still gets a nice chunk of money to sign. It would not be at all hard to fit a contract like he wants under the cap.

The question is, do we want him and does he fit what we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cutting deangelo williams after june 1 would free up cap space.

I was under the assumption that cutting D-Will regardless of June 1st designation would still cost us cap room this year due to excellerated payment of his contract.

We owe him

2013 base 4.75, bonus 3.2

2014 base 5.75, bonus 3.2

2015 base 6.75, bonus 3.2

If we June 1st split payment over 2013 and 2014 we still increase this years cap hit due to needing to pay off the bonus and the fact that his base salary was guaranteed. (I am no expert). Feel free to correct anything I messed up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we ran a zone blocking scheme? Isn't that why we took Amini last year?

 

No, we run a zone-read running scheme. Completely different from the zone blocking scheme, or the ZBS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would be an upgrade but Bell is serviceable and I think can be above average with better guard play.

 

Statistically speaking, he's one of the worst starting OTs in the league.  I think "average" would be his ceiling and he'd have to get a lot better to be average.

 

If I knew he could get to average (and maybe the staff feels confident that he can), I wouldn't even be looking at RT.  Average isn't a bad thing.  You can't have a team full of future HOFers.  I'd rather have average at non-vital positions and save the cap space to pay for great at the vital positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would be an upgrade but Bell is serviceable and I think can be above average with better guard play.

 

bell should be a back up.

 

I'd rather we got someone better on the outside. we do better by having the weak spot be between RT and C than we do having the weak spot on the end.

 

if we're going to have someone serviceable on the OL, I'd rather it be at guard than tackle.

 

there's nothing special about bell other than doing ok for being a udfa. nice story, but we need more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Statistically speaking, he's one of the worst starting OTs in the league.  I think "average" would be his ceiling and he'd have to get a lot better to be average.

 

If I knew he could get to average (and maybe the staff feels confident that he can), I wouldn't even be looking at RT.  Average isn't a bad thing.  You can't have a team full of future HOFers.  I'd rather have average at non-vital positions and save the cap space to pay for great at the vital positions.

 

I honestly don't put much stock into stats. Even with Cam. That's why I think Hixon was a pretty damn good signing. Dude makes plays.

 

But back to Bell. I know what I've seen and I've watched games multiple times.  Bell is average. He needs help on the right side to be that or a little better. He needs consistency with those around him. When he is asked to do too much he falls on his face. He is good for what he is, serviceable.  Plug in a consistent guard next to him and you will see better protection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...