Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Coleman worth a look in the supplemental draft?


Recommended Posts

I dont think he is eligible and by all accounts I have read he is playing next year and planning to enter the 2014 draft.  The six players that appear to be eligible are:

 

DE James Boyd, UNLV

DT Nate Holloway, UNLV

DE Toby Jackson, Central Florida

WR DeWayne Peace, Houston

WR O.J. Ross, Purdue

DB Damond Smith, South Alabama

 

If he were/is eligible then he might be worth a look. Sounds very interesting as he could be a gem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The supplemental draft uses the lottery style draft.  You bid a pick on a player and who ever bids highest wins.  What ever pick you bid you lose come next draft.  Say we bid a second rounder on a player and win, now we have no 2nd round pick in the upcoming draft.  

 

 

I say no to this.  For the first time in a long time we have our full compliment of draft picks and this seems to be a pretty good draft for WR coming up.  Lets just play this out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the usual picks you give up next year for a supplemental draft pick?

Didn't the Browns have to give up like a 3rd for Joe Haden?

None of those guys intrigue me.

Browns took a second in the supplimental on Josh Gordon. Worked well for them.

I agree though you shouldn't give up picks unless you think there is somebody that can make an immidiate impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the usual picks you give up next year for a supplemental draft pick?

 

Didn't the Browns have to give up like a 3rd for Joe Haden?

 

None of those guys intrigue me.

 

 

Haden was a top ten pick in his draft. They did give a 2nd rounder last year in the supplemental draft for Josh Gordon, who actually played pretty well for them last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The supplemental draft uses the lottery style draft.  You bid a pick on a player and who ever bids highest wins.  What ever pick you bid you lose come next draft.  Say we bid a second rounder on a player and win, now we have no 2nd round pick in the upcoming draft.  

 

 

I say no to this.  For the first time in a long time we have our full compliment of draft picks and this seems to be a pretty good draft for WR coming up.  Lets just play this out.

 

 

 

yea I would only do this if I felt like WR was the ONLY piece we absolutely needed to guarantee a superbowl run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haden was a top ten pick in his draft. They did give a 2nd rounder last year in the supplemental draft for Josh Gordon, who actually played pretty well for them last year. 

 

yep got the two switched. How do they decide what you give up for a pick though?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep got the two switched. How do they decide what you give up for a pick though?

 

 

 

someone mentioned in a post above but it's a bidding system. The highest bidder is awarded the player, but loses that pick in the following draft. So if we bid a third rounder, but the 49ers bid a second rounder and no one else places a bid- the 9ers will be awarded the player but lose their 2014 second rounder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep got the two switched. How do they decide what you give up for a pick though?

Team places a pick (any round they choose) on said player. Then the highest pick wins. If two teams place the same bid the player goes to the one with the worst record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He only wants to be traded because it's the Vikings who are calling. If he didn't want to be here, he could have retired, instead he took a pay raise to come back for another season.  I get it, it's an opportunity that he'd like to take, but we shouldn't cut off our nose to spite our face because he now wants to jump at this opportunity less than two weeks before the season starts. I'm not against trading him, I'm just against trading him for a return that doesn't help our team as much as having him on the roster would.  I'll put it this way, if a 5th is the best we can get for him from the Vikings and he's now dug in on not wanting to stay this year, I'm saying screw you and trading him to any of the other 30 teams besides the Vikings for the best offer we can get. He was perfectly happy here a week ago, if the Vikings soured him on that and then want to get him for peanuts, then screw them both.
    • Yes and no, he wants to go back and his wife most definitely wants to go back. He took a bunch of team mates to Minny and has worked out with JJ two offseasons in a row. It's where both him and his wife are from.    The money was basically a please come back and help Bryce. Pretty please...here's some more money.    Now he's agreed to a paycut to go back to the Vikings. 
    • Because he won't be here next year, we aren't winning this year and we need to see if Renfrow or Horn can be that guy going forward. If Bryce isn't good enough to do poo without AT we need to find that out this year as well. I'm fine keeping him but his role needs to be slowly reduced throughout the year anyway so we know what we have for the future
×
×
  • Create New...