Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game on the line... you going with Beason, Morgan or Keuchly....

charlottenian

By charlottenian,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

gmonjimbo Community Regular

gmonjimbo

Posted
Posted

Depends on the situation. If it is  3rd and long, I would go with Beason because he is better than Kuechly and Morgan in pass coverage. However, if it was  3rd and short, I would choose Kuechly because he has good instincts and might stuff the run before it develops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kuech the Sneak Newbie

Kuech the Sneak

Posted
Posted

Depends on the situation. If it is 3rd and long, I would go with Beason because he is better than Kuechly and Morgan in pass coverage. However, if it was 3rd and short, I would choose Kuechly because he has good instincts and might stuff the run before it develops.

What he said, I feel more inclined to go with kuechly though just based on how great a tackler he is

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

and why? everything being equal and all are healthy....

My nod is to Morgan, I think he was just as good of a tackler as Keuchly but better in the passing coverage

well, who would I take if they all only had 1 year under their belt? Luke. IMO, Luke is the best after one year.

Who would I pick....if going off the best we have seen. Morgan. If I had him at his best and knew he would be healthy for a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

IMO, too many have forgotten just what type of player Morgan was. He was a tackling machine for the same reasons Keek is. Instincts and knowledge. They are both students of the game. As is Beast.

I would go with Morgan for the simple reason he could do it all. Keek is not quite there yet, but could eventually be the best of the bunch. Beast would not be a bad choice either. Hellz, anyone one of them will make the play.

For a franchise as young as ours. It really is amazing how many great MLBs we have had. There really is no wrong answer to this question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Moonraker
      TNF: Rams/Seahawks

      By Moonraker · Posted

      I'm salty every time I see someones mid picks become stars while we throw first and second rounders over and over and they all stink outside of Tet (who still has a lot to prove, imo)
    • strato
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By strato · Posted

      There is a contingent that is total Bryce but they weathervane with the wind. When the good Bryce wind blows about once or twice a month we hear a lot from them. But they are always pro Bryce, they just don’t pipe up too much when he sucks. I can’t speak for them, as far as what they are looking at.    In a second contingent, the collective mind is made up. He has had had basically three years worth of starts that might include a top tier outing or two, a few second tier outings, offset by about the same number of bottom tier outings which actually may have the edge there.  The rest of his stuff is third tier and that is going to be the bulk of his starts. We want to move on. And we aren’t getting off of that hill until he puts us off of it. He has not.    There is a third contingent that has no conviction and definitely weather vanes. Bryce is good. Bryce isn’t good. Depending on the latest game. They will buy into 7 on 7 success so that should tell you something. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      TNF: Rams/Seahawks

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Nacua is really fuging good. He might be a better version of Cooper Kupp.
×
×
  • Create New...