Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game on the line... you going with Beason, Morgan or Keuchly....

charlottenian

By charlottenian,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

gmonjimbo Community Regular

gmonjimbo

Posted
Posted

Depends on the situation. If it is  3rd and long, I would go with Beason because he is better than Kuechly and Morgan in pass coverage. However, if it was  3rd and short, I would choose Kuechly because he has good instincts and might stuff the run before it develops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kuech the Sneak Newbie

Kuech the Sneak

Posted
Posted

Depends on the situation. If it is 3rd and long, I would go with Beason because he is better than Kuechly and Morgan in pass coverage. However, if it was 3rd and short, I would choose Kuechly because he has good instincts and might stuff the run before it develops.

What he said, I feel more inclined to go with kuechly though just based on how great a tackler he is

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

and why? everything being equal and all are healthy....

My nod is to Morgan, I think he was just as good of a tackler as Keuchly but better in the passing coverage

well, who would I take if they all only had 1 year under their belt? Luke. IMO, Luke is the best after one year.

Who would I pick....if going off the best we have seen. Morgan. If I had him at his best and knew he would be healthy for a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

IMO, too many have forgotten just what type of player Morgan was. He was a tackling machine for the same reasons Keek is. Instincts and knowledge. They are both students of the game. As is Beast.

I would go with Morgan for the simple reason he could do it all. Keek is not quite there yet, but could eventually be the best of the bunch. Beast would not be a bad choice either. Hellz, anyone one of them will make the play.

For a franchise as young as ours. It really is amazing how many great MLBs we have had. There really is no wrong answer to this question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mother Grabber
      Off Season Thread

      By Mother Grabber · Posted

      FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • WUnderhill
      Off Season Thread

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Panthers Fan 69
      Off Season Thread

      By Panthers Fan 69 · Posted

      Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...