Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Notice the media slowly building Cam up?


Zod

Recommended Posts

I've not seen anything positive.  Please give examples.  The only thing I saw this weekend was on NFLN they did a blowthrough on the weekend's games, and they only showed one play(the int) from our game while saying something like, "can't do that Cam".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the right way for the media to cover the panthers? Since it seems like we bitch whenever they diss us, ignore us, or hype us up.

 

 

Just some good ol' fashion journalistic integrity is all I ask. 

 

That includes not doing the following:

 

- pulling quotes out of context a la Peter King "entertainer and icon" tweet

 

- sensationalizing a la SVP saying Cam is just a "me me me guy" or Cowherd saying Cam may be a bust after he breaks nearly every rookie QB record in the books

 

- taking blatant cheap shots at a player or team a la Prisco's probowl article one year late or NFL.com which has taken shot after shot on the Panthers and Cam this offseason

 

I get that a large portion of media now a days only cares about ratings.  They literally will say or write anything just to get a rise out of people.

 

The rest of the national media are really just bandwagoners.  They don't have the effort or will to pay attention to small market teams like Carolina, so they just follow each other's tails wherever that may lead them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As predicted, they are starting to build Cam up. The only thing they like more than tearing an athlete down, is a story of redemption while building him up again.

 

fug the national media (most of them anyway)! They have lost ALL credibility when it comes to covering Cam Newton. We don't need any Johnny-come-latelys telling us what we already know and knew.  Lucky for them,  they are dealing with a gracious and classy kid who naturally displays decorum and sweet southern charm because he's really that guy.  If it were me, I'd be saying "Oh, now you wanna get on the bandwagon?  Like Martin always says, 'Get to steppin!'"

 

 

 

Furthermore, they are ready to Pearl Harbor him at a moment's notice. I'll never trust them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We have our own issues with Bryce but it’s crazy how this franchise was dragged through the media the last 2 years for missing out on CJ Stroud and Caleb Williams   *whispers* Bryce played better than both of them in the playoffs the real mistake was mortgaging the future for Bryce when Drake Maye could have been there the next year
    • This board has a meltdown over literally everything. It means nothing.
    • O-line: 1 major player for Tackle (draft or FA) and a Center (if we don't resign Mayes). WR: Low pick or good FA signing? D-LIne: Def need a NT and a DE/OLB who can rush the QB. FA or Draft? TE; I don't know what they want to think of what they do? MLB: I think it's out 1st rd pick, but getting another in FA wouldn't hurt, thoughts? DBs; We need another sticky QB to play more man when needed. Again a 1st or 2nd rd pick IMO.  S: Everybody says we need a rangy centerfielder, draft or FA? Would you take one high in the draft? I don't use players because there are no guarantees who's there, just asking what makes sense. We know they'll fill "all" the holes in FA and then draft, so which FA are the better ones and which are just 1 year fillers? My thought: FA - Big DT, DE/OLB & MLB. 2 of 3 as those take a which to develop. Draft: MLB or Tackle, DB in the 2nd, DE/OLB in the 3rd. I think they need a solid T if Icki doesn't return better than before and Moton is getting old.  I also think thy need to resign BC on the O-line.  
×
×
  • Create New...