Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Last night gave me hope for our offensive line and WR corps


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Details, since the topic title pretty much sums it up.

 

Nate Chandler:  I saw him get bent over (off balance) once and the QB would have been hammered, but it was a three step drop with a quick release, so the technique is not as critical--in fact, the blocker wants to drop step and attack with the next move to get the DL hands down, so I understand the reason balance may be an issue for a neophyte.  The rest of the time I saw very solid feet.  Not much in the run game-he has decent technique but loses power at the point of contact, something experience willl fix.  There is reason to feel good about Chandler, IMO (now watch him get cut).

 

Byron Bell:  I am not sure what he was doing at LT (I hope they are not grooming him for the post-Gross era) but he seems to be getting better with his footwork.  Speed rushers will always give him problems.

 

Scott and Hicks:  When I watched them, both were good. Big boys to play RG. Expect one, probably Scott, to make the team.  I would not be surprised to see Hicks hit the PS.

 

We showed sgns of depth. 

 

At WR, the best thing that happened was Seattle got some film of Ginn and us beating them deep.  Now step up, Sherman.    However, Ginn is going to drop some balls.  He is no worse, however, than Murphy last season. 

 

Hixon showed about what he is capable of doing, but I was impressed that he did not seem rusty.

 

Lafell looked like a veteran on that sideline route.  Oh yeah, he is one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Details, since the topic title pretty much sums it up.

Nate Chandler: I saw him get bent over (off balance) once and the QB would have been hammered, but it was a three step drop with a quick release, so the technique is not as critical--in fact, the blocker wants to drop step and attack with the next move to get the DL hands down, so I understand the reason balance may be an issue for a neophyte. The rest of the time I saw very solid feet. Not much in the run game-he has decent technique but loses power at the point of contact, something experience willl fix. There is reason to feel good about Chandler, IMO (now watch him get cut).

Byron Bell: I am not sure what he was doing at LT (I hope they are not grooming him for the post-Gross era) but he seems to be getting better with his footwork. Speed rushers will always give him problems.

Scott and Hicks: When I watched them, both were good. Big boys to play RG. Expect one, probably Scott, to make the team. I would not be surprised to see Hicks hit the PS.

We showed sgns of depth.

At WR, the best thing that happened was Seattle got some film of Ginn and us beating them deep. Now step up, Sherman. However, Ginn is going to drop some balls. He is no worse, however, than Murphy last season.

Hixon showed about what he is capable of doing, but I was impressed that he did not seem rusty.

Lafell looked like a veteran on that sideline route. Oh yeah, he is one.

Sherman will be all over Smitty....Cam will need to find another CB to challenge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that someone got tape on ginn catching deep passes and touchdowns. he will get more rolled coverage from deep safeties from the get-go, which of course will open things up underneath. dude is going to be fearsome

 

Yup, that's the idea... Ginn stretching the field with Smitty in the slot and Olsen underneath = long day for the opposing defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherman will be all over Smitty....Cam will need to find another CB to challenge

 

I expect there to be a few words exchanged between the two.  I think, however, that Smitty in his prime would abuse a big CB.  We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great, there is more than one WR on the roster who can catch and be a deep threat. While we were all watching the passing game move the offense up and down the field, Mike Morgan and Mike Rucker spent the entire broadcast talking at length about the power running game the Panthers want to run this season. 

 

The passing game was very good during the preseason, the running game was somewhere south of really bad, but the power running game will be the offensive feature of the 2013 Panthers. Sorry, I did not see this O-line move anyone off the ball in any of the 4 preseason games and without Tolbert on the field, I don't see a RB on the roster who is going to simply put his head down and run over anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect there to be a few words exchanged between the two. I think, however, that Smitty in his prime would abuse a big CB. We will see.

He isn't though. Round 1 already went to Sherman. I think the key will be finding Olsen and another WR to make plays for us week 1. Just let Smith keep Sherman away from the action

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherman will be on Smitty, but Smitty will get his. He always does. I put the over/under on Smitty/Sherman skirmishes at 3. It might be wise to take the over.

Didn't last time he saw Sherman.

And if there are skirmishes again, Sherman wins again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't last time he saw Sherman.

And if there are skirmishes again, Sherman wins again

 

    Sherman...does...not want...any...of steve...in a fight....ie Ken Lucas...Hell Smitty slung Hardy in training camp. Sherman may very well keep Cam from getting the ball to Steve but I'll take Smitty over anyone not named Suh in a fight ha.

    Panthers should move Smith around ALOT to see if they can move him away from Sherman. I take a 3 WR set of Smith, Lafell, and Ginn over a 2nd TE(Hartsock and Williams or Ginn? I take speed!). Either Seattle bites on the Ginn threat and Olsen, Lafell and our backs are freed up or they don't and Ginn takes one over the top. 

 

I hope our game plan is not just a power O at Seattle.  I hope we come out like we did vs Arizona and Green Bay 2 years ago and just let Cam rip it with no huddle and spread them out. JMO but if we let Cam be Cam and light them up the first series or 2 then I think we can run it once we loosen them up. I wish we had Houston or Washingtons oline to block for our RB's but we don't, and I think playing like we do would  be foolish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...