Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A (not so) Friendly Reminder


Zod

Recommended Posts

We are cracking down this season on thoughtless and annoying threads.

 

Post a new reactionary thread with "FIRE _________" or "WTF" or something similar it will get deleted and you get a week ban.

 

That crap draws resources on gameday that we need for actual quality threads and posts. In short, if you aren't very bright, avoid creating threads today. It won't end well for you.

 

 

Love,

 

 

Zod

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rarely open a thread, usually by the time i see something some were it is her in like 5 seconds. I think all of 2 times i ever scooped anything. But ive been reading the huddle for 10 years and look at my lame post count.

 

 

You are one of the posters that is quality over quantity post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly there probably should always be a 24 hour moratorium on all posting after games, win or lose.

Nah we just need to create an Bizarro Huddle where people think they're posting a new thread, but actually they're the only ones who can see it. Then you create a few bots who auto reply to said thread with standard huddle messages like:

 

I agree

I disagree

I don't care

TL;DR

Cam is the best QB ever

Cam is the worst QB ever

That's racist

That's reverse racist

Fire RR

Stoic RR gif

Our o-line sucks

Our o-line is doing surprising well

The season is over... we suck

SUPERBOWLZ!1!!1!

I can't believe we just did that

I can't believe WE just did THAT

 

I think this system would fool most of the new thread posters on gameday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Totally.  I'm less comparing them as players and using him as a reference point.  I legitimately think Bryce is capable of being a better NFL QB than Kyler has been.  Kyler has no clutch gene and doesn't seem to have a grip on the locker room, or much love for the game.  Much different body types/strengths and weaknesses.   Crazy to think-- but Kyler is at year 7 as a 1.01...38-48-1 on his career, 0-1 in the playoffs. He's somehow played well enough to keep it going but crazy to think he's barely even touched the playoffs.  Hasn't done anything that special for the Cards.  That's what you don't want to be stuck in.  Cardinals are in softball purgatory with him.    
    • It's not analysis. There was no attempt to analyze anything or even convey new information at all.
    • As to the topic, I've complained before about "superstar" mentality, i.e. the notion that you can win championships with one superstar player surrounded by a group of mediocre fill ins. It just doesn't work. The Manning-Brady rivalry was something of a showcase for that. The Colts general approach focused everything on Manning. The Patriots? Oh, they also had a superstar quarterback but they built a complete team, especially on the defensive side. This sort of thing is why I've argued many times that "system quarterback" should be to considered a description, not an insult. I know everybody loves the "MVP" athletic types, and they're fun to watch, but that's not necessarily the true path to consistent winning and championship glory.
×
×
  • Create New...