Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A (not so) Friendly Reminder

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
Posted

We are cracking down this season on thoughtless and annoying threads.

 

Post a new reactionary thread with "FIRE _________" or "WTF" or something similar it will get deleted and you get a week ban.

 

That crap draws resources on gameday that we need for actual quality threads and posts. In short, if you aren't very bright, avoid creating threads today. It won't end well for you.

 

 

Love,

 

 

Zod

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Squirrel Collaborator

Squirrel

Posted
Posted

I rarely open a thread, usually by the time i see something some were it is her in like 5 seconds. I think all of 2 times i ever scooped anything. But ive been reading the huddle for 10 years and look at my lame post count.

 

 

You are one of the posters that is quality over quantity post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
xerxes Newbie

xerxes

Posted
Posted

Honestly there probably should always be a 24 hour moratorium on all posting after games, win or lose.

Nah we just need to create an Bizarro Huddle where people think they're posting a new thread, but actually they're the only ones who can see it. Then you create a few bots who auto reply to said thread with standard huddle messages like:

 

I agree

I disagree

I don't care

TL;DR

Cam is the best QB ever

Cam is the worst QB ever

That's racist

That's reverse racist

Fire RR

Stoic RR gif

Our o-line sucks

Our o-line is doing surprising well

The season is over... we suck

SUPERBOWLZ!1!!1!

I can't believe we just did that

I can't believe WE just did THAT

 

I think this system would fool most of the new thread posters on gameday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...