Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good Game Seahawks


Zod

Recommended Posts

Had quite a few visitors from their site this week.

 

The Seahawks did enough to win the game and deserve credit.

 

The two plays that stick in my mind are the Wilson pass to the sidelines where he got absolutely creamed but completed the pass even after a review and the textbook strip of Deangelo at the end. There aren't many running backs out there that could have hung on to that ball, just a great defensive play.

 

 

So good luck the rest of the year, and please destroy the rest of the NFC South for us.

 

See ya in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. Seahawks came to play and won. We made some mistakes and we paid for it and lost. Good game Seahawks. Time to go back to the drawing board for Ron and his coaching staff for next week game. All I can say at this point. We have a long season on our hands as fans. :gym:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson impressed me. He was under pressure, took some big hits, but still made some accurate big-time throws. Kid has that x-factor. I remember when Jake could just throw the ball up and find its way into a teammates hands for some great comeback wins. Then karma turned on him and all he could do was throw INT's. That Arizona game still haunts me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...