Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the Panthers - Week 3


Zod

Recommended Posts

I will be updating this thread as the season goes on so we can see how the team is trending on the important rankings. Yes, yes, I know the W-L is the most important stat you nincompoops.

 

This is for those interested in the trends of the Panthers offense and defense as compared to week 1...

 

Week 3

 

Offense

 

Yards per game - 24th  +4

Points per game - 17st +14

Total Plays - 13th +14

 

Defense

 

Yards per game - 10th +4

Points per game - 4th +1

3rd down % - 17th -5

 

 

To all of you saying stats are not important... take a look around at all the happy fans, then notice all the green in this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did we drop 5 spots in 3rd down %

 

yeah, not quite sure about that either.

 

Seahawks Third Down Efficiency 6/13 - 46%

Bills Third Down Efficiency 6/14 - 42%

Giants Third Down Efficiency 3/12 - 25%

 

seems like we've done nothing but get better there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume that other teams in the NFL have just done better on third down than we have since week 1.  Especially with the scoring that happened in week 1, its possible almost everyone in the NFL had bad 3rd down %, and just by normal games happening the past 2 weeks, its starting to even itself out a bit.  Atleast, that is the only guess I can muster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...