Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Hardy extension?


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

I do too, but I would like to sign him without breaking the bank. I have zero faith in Alexander or Horton to take over for him.

I don't see us breaking the bank for him. I think we will offer him a good deal and it will be kind of a take it or leave it. So far I have no reason to believe gettleman will throw cj money at him. We have too many other needs to fill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do too, but I would like to sign him without breaking the bank. I have zero faith in Alexander or Horton to take over for him.

I just feel as fans and having no experience in player negotiations, you're not going to get the answer in here. I want to keep Hardy as much as anyone but the dude is such a fuging wildcard. I don't want to overpay. We also have other big contracts coming up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not want to have a sports agent represent me that was not a douche. Same with attorneys. They aren't douches to their clients, just everyone else.

 

 

Also, I don't think we will be able to sign Hardy long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am guessing Gettlemen backed off after Hardy's 3 sack performance.  I imagine he could have another today.  

 

What I would do if I were Gettlemen:  I would take their initial offer and write it on the white board.  Let's say it is for $12 million.  Then I would hand out copies of his 50 sack promise.  I would write a big 50 on the board.  Then I would draw a line above the 50 and write down how many actual sacks he has, thus creating a fraction that demonstrates his underachievement.  I would convert that fraction into a percentage (let's say 10%) and multiply $12 million by 10%.  I would then write down "$1.2 million" on a piece of paper, turn it face down on the table, and slide it to Hardy and his agent.

 

Boom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know there have been discussions. You can assume they're ongoing, but no way to know where they stand right now.

Gettleman wouldn't have previously been in a position where he'd have negotiated directly with Rosenhaus, but you gotta figure he's familiar with him (and likely well acquainted) given all his years in front office positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am guessing Gettlemen backed off after Hardy's 3 sack performance. I imagine he could have another today.

What I would do if I were Gettlemen: I would take their initial offer and write it on the white board. Let's say it is for $12 million. Then I would hand out copies of his 50 sack promise. I would write a big 50 on the board. Then I would draw a line above the 50 and write down how many actual sacks he has, thus creating a fraction that demonstrates his underachievement. I would convert that fraction into a percentage (let's say 10%) and multiply $12 million by 10%. I would then write down "$1.2 million" on a piece of paper, turn it face down on the table, and slide it to Hardy and his agent.

Boom.

This was actually clever and well thought out.

But public ridicule I don't think is the best way to resign our potential free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was actually clever and well thought out.

But public ridicule I don't think is the best way to resign our potential free agents.

 

Just a joke Monsta.--Nobody expected Hardy to get 50 sacks, including Hardy and his agent. Since he is doing well and the 50 sacks was just a "tongue-in-cheek" comment, it was not meant to ridicule.   I do not think we can re-sign him  because Marty paid CJ too much.  I would consider trading CJ to re-sign Hardy, but I do not like the idea of losing Hardy.  I smell a franchise tag situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fans view “box safety” with the same disdain they have when they hear “game manager” QB.   but there’s a reason most 1st round safeties are “box safeties”-it’s a much longer list of requisite skills to be a good box safety than it is to be a guy whose only real responsibility is to not get beat over the top. Fans crave the ed reed type and as someone who has never been able to enjoy this franchise having a guy like that, I get the enthusiasm-but I’m not really prepared to spend a first round pick on a free safety. If it happens it’ll be fun, it’ll address a need with a good player and that’s well and good. But those guys end up walking after their first contract because their pedigree usually outpaces what their teams feel like they’re adding to their overall win total.
    • Its criminal that the upcoming season is mainly in the tiny hands of BY.  I still member the time I did a full turn, if you member his first off-season from that Panthers all-time worst team....... Answering questions at his first presser, he goes along the lines " I didn't do nothing, no weight room or throwing" " I needed to get away". I was fully out with him, the guy didn't even try to improve his football mind, body, strength, in the biggest joke of panther football. I could not believe it, what a leader or dare say "point guard"(lols @ NBA point guards as a ref)
    • I view FS almost as the NT of the secondary. Oftentimes the true measure of his impact isn't necessarily in the plays that he makes but what he allows you to do with the rest of your defense to allow them to make plays. When you have that elite true sideline to sideline FS safety blanket over the top of the defense it allows you to be a lot more aggressive with everyone else. Where as when you have a Nick Scott as your last line of defense you gotta be mindful to not have to rely too heavily on that.
×
×
  • Create New...